Ah, yes! That's exactly what I needed! Thank you!

~Faelin


On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Mark Allen <mrall...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I typically see classes with delegated methods use a
>
> default => sub { {} },
>
> or
>
> default => sub { [] },
>
> stanza in the definition(s) depending on whether they're Hash or Array
> traits.
>
> I agree this should be better documented though
>
> Mark
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *From:* Faelin McCaley Landy <faelin.la...@gmail.com>
> *To:* Chris Weyl <cw...@alumni.drew.edu>; Moose Mailing List <
> moose@perl.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 25, 2013 4:54 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Issue with HashRef attritubes
>
> Here's a sample of the code in question (assume the appropriate pragmas
> for type constraints):
>
>
> has 'locations' => (
>     traits  => ['Hash'],
>     is  => 'ro',
>     isa => 'HashRef[Location]',
>     handles => {
>         add_loc => 'set',
>         del_loc => 'delete',
>         get_loc => 'get',
> loc_keys => 'keys',
>  loc_vals => 'values',
>         no_locs => 'is_empty',
>         loc_count => 'count',
> loc_pairs => 'kv',
>     },
> );
>
>
> has 'regions' => (
>     traits  => ['Hash'],
>     is  => 'ro',
>     isa => 'HashRef[Region]',
>     handles => {
>         add_region => 'set',
>         del_region => 'delete',
>         get_region => 'get',
>  region_keys => 'keys',
> region_vals => 'values',
>         no_regions => 'is_empty',
>         region_count => 'count',
>  region_pairs => 'kv',
>     },
> );
>
> When I attempt to access the locations hashref or its handles from within
> this class, I only get an error saying that it could not find the requested
> hash/function. However, when I attempt to access the regions hashref/handles,
> it has no problems.
>
> Side note, I'm using namespace::sweep if that makes a difference.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Chris Weyl <cw...@alumni.drew.edu>wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Faelin McCaley Landy wrote:
>
>  Moose, you do confound me so! Any ideas, guys?
>
>
> Not without seeing some of the code in question :)
>
>                       -Chris
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to