In my last message when I said 'hours, minutes, seconds' i meant
'hours, minutes, am/pm'. If a user did decide they needed seconds as
well, maybe it could be made easy to extend the HoverPicker.Time Class
to add it, but it was just a typo on my part.
Anyway, decades sounds like a good way to do the year, but I think
there should be some way to omit it, as in, only allow the user to
pick month and day and have the year be assumed. I was originally
thinking in terms of the 'Publish Article On:' date range instead of
'When were you born:' date range.
If I come up with any good ideas for the interface I'll let you know ;)
- Tom
On Oct 10, 2008, at 3:54 PM, SilverTab wrote:
Been trying to fix the IE bug for a while with no luck... if anyone
has a clue as to why the whole thing isn't positioned properly in IE
(it should be like 20 or so pixels lower) please let me know ...
Right now this is what it looks like:
Text Element, Div (Positioned absolutely) > ul, ul, ul (all
positioned absolutely)
I tried the following:
Text Element, Div (Positioned absolutely) > Div (Positioned
relatively) > ul, ul, ul (all positioned absolutely)
but no luck... :(
On Oct 10, 2:40 pm, SilverTab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gotta agree that scrolling would make it so much cooler hehe...
First thing first though, right now the code is very messy (i.e. I
didn't code it with Time AND Date in mind so it's not very
"inheritance" friendly...) so the first step I guess would be to
separate the methods/properties etc to determine if it should be part
of .Base, .Date or .Time.... Probably a bunch of methods that need to
be re-written with that in mind....
And IE is still a problem :-(
On Oct 10, 2:34 pm, "Guillermo Rauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's good, but scroll when the right and left boundaries are
reached would
be amazing too...For example when there're more than 10 elements,
the rest
are hidden and scrolling is enabled.
options: {
scrollAt: 10
}
It'd be coded into HoverPicker base.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:24 PM, SilverTab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
hmmm should've read your post before I posted mine.... decade is
definitely a way to do it!....
On Oct 10, 1:53 pm, "Guillermo Rauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, and a possible implementation for dates: decade first, then
specific
year.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Guillermo Rauch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I love the plugin, but I don't think it's Mootools More worthy.
Plus,
our.mootools is coming and we're gonna have dozens of impressive
plugins :)
--
Guillermo Rauchhttp://devthought.com
--
Guillermo Rauchhttp://devthought.com
