You care if your site content is available to search bots but not visitors? Strange...
On Jan 7, 6:55 am, "Thierry bela nanga" <[email protected]> wrote: > yeah but, > > I use JS to build the page (tabs, etc), without it you'll have an ugly > content. the content remain available for search bots that's the most > important for me. > > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Guillermo Rauch <[email protected]> wrote: > > Which makes the content unavailable for people with CSS on but JS off. > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Thierry bela nanga <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> my method to avoid this is to hide content initially with css, i define a > >> class .hidden {display: none} and then I use the domready to remove the the > >> class. > > >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:01 PM, keif <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> FUC = Flash of Unstyled/Unrendered Content > > >>> This cropped up mainly because of an alphaPNG script, extended > >>> elements script, and a couple other scripts that modifed the page. > > >>> On Jan 5, 7:46 am, Michal <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > FUC?? I think maybe I'm not that good with those internet acronyms.... > > >>> > On Jan 5, 12:32 pm, keif <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > With putting scripts at the bottom, it's been more of a "YMMV" > >>> > > approach - I can't find the yahoo article, but it's been discussed > >>> > > more than once that many people say "put it in the footer" when it's > >>> > > not a practice they follow themselves because of certain issues (one > >>> > > thing I've noticed, loading all JS in the footer causes FUC > >>> > > sometimes). > > >>> > > -keif > > >>> > > On Jan 5, 5:38 am, Nicolas Trani <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > > Hi, > > >>> > > > @Michal : > >>> > > > Putting scripts at bottom speed up your page loading, i suggest you > >>> to > >>> > > > read this : > >>>http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#js_bottom > > >>> > > > @Wanlee : > >>> > > > I suggest you to continue to use domready anyway. > > >>> > > > Maye be you can post a page to show your code? > > >>> > > > Regards. > > >>> > > > Michal a écrit : > > >>> > > > > Are you saying that 'domready' fires too early, before the html > >>> is > >>> > > > > ready? This sounds strange. It could be: > > >>> > > > > - A bug with domready. I suspect this is unlikely as this is so > >>> > > > > heavily used and tested. But if you can construct a testcase, > >>> post a > >>> > > > > bug in lighthouse. > >>> > > > > - A bug with your code somewhere: are you sure everything that > >>> > > > > accesses the DOM is inside a domready listener? > > >>> > > > > I have seen advice somewhere on the internet that says you should > >>> put > >>> > > > > Javascript at the bottom of the html, but it's never quite sat > >>> well > >>> > > > > with me, it seems a bit hackish, but I don't quite know why. I > >>> always > >>> > > > > put it in the head, with a domready. Maybe others have other > >>> > > > > suggestions... > > >>> > > > > There is the 'load' event, that waits for all images to load as > >>> well, > >>> > > > > you could try that, but I suspect that there is something else > >>> afoot. > > >>> > > > > Can you post a link to the page you're talking about? > > >>> > > > > Michal. > > >>> > > > > On Jan 5, 8:32 am, wanlee <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > > >> I'm writing a few functions for sliders and json requests and it > >>> > > > >> appears that the javascript is loading faster than the html > >>> causing > >>> > > > >> the slider to not initialize. it doesn't happen on every page > >>> load but > >>> > > > >> more so in safari. > > >>> > > > >> moving my script tags to the bottom of the html solves the > >>> problem. is > >>> > > > >> this normal or could there be something wrong with my code? > >>> should i > >>> > > > >> use something other than 'domready'? > > >>> > > > >> take swing! > > >>> > > > -- > >>> > > > Nicolas Trani - web engineer > >>> > > > Weelya - Improve the web > >>> > > > 32 rue du faubourg boutonnet > >>> > > > 34090 Montpellier > >>> > > > Tel/Fax : 04 67 169 778http://www.weelya.com > > >>> > > > Notre agence sera fermée du 12 au 16 janvier 2009 > > >> -- > >> fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51 > > > -- > > Guillermo Rauch > >http://devthought.com > > -- > fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51
