Alright, take 2!

http://iaian7.com/webcode/mediaboxAdvanced

This is another go-to of mine...fingers crossed!

On Jan 29, 4:01 am, Deleyna <dele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I did consider that. Wanted it badly. For some reason, though it
> failed all of my accessibility testing.
>
> On Jan 28, 11:36 am, csuwldcat <daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Wow that site you linked to has a crap ton of full page loads, ever
> > consider a solution like this:
>
> >http://digitarald.de/project/squeezebox/
>
> > Just saying...
>
> > On Jan 28, 9:44 am, Deleyna <dele...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > OK. Thanks for checking -- anyone who did -- I'd already tried the
> > > obvious variants, and the css works without the script. I have given
> > > up and put a conditional test in for Safari and just skip the script
> > > in Safari. The site works acceptably, but I'm disappointed that it
> > > couldn't be made to work cross-browser as I had intended. I'm not sure
> > > why I couldn't get a little more help from this group, though. I
> > > figure it is either because my error is too dumb to merit a comment or
> > > because even you illustrious folks couldn't figure it out.
>
> > > Since my stupid errors have garnered assistance in the past, I'm going
> > > to go with "you couldn't figure it out either."
>
> > > I am intrigued by the person who saw it work on Safari. I had noticed
> > > that it worked about 1 in 10 times, and that the effect was
> > > inconsistent -- which is where I get completely lost. Somehow you got
> > > it to work for you.
>
> > > Of course, now with the conditional, it "works" routinely -- just
> > > without any pretty moo.
>
> > > On Jan 27, 7:36 am, rpflo <rpflore...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I just tested in Safari and FireFox, seems to behave almost the same
> > > > (safari seams to morph from top left down and to the right, firefox
> > > > seemes to morph from bottom left to top right).  Perfectly usable in
> > > > Safari.
>
> > > > My guess is it's all CSS stuff.  When I'm doing effects I like to
> > > > ditch the javascript first and see how my two css instructions render.
>
> > > > On Jan 27, 8:14 am, Deleyna <dele...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > I know this probably isn't the best way to handle the problem, but I
> > > > > noticed someone else's complaining email getting a response, where my
> > > > > nice "here's my problem, can anyone help" has gotten 0 responses. So I
> > > > > thought...maybe just a little whine?
>
> > > > > OK, maybe not.
>
> > > > > All kidding aside, can anyone help me understand why a page that works
> > > > > great in Firefox, IE -- even IE6 -- etc. Is completely unusable in
> > > > > Safari? I use a more from one class to another. I'm sure I've done
> > > > > something wrong, because I am noo to moo...and to Javascript, but I'm
> > > > > trying to learn. When you click on a link, it should open a window
> > > > > with the text. It DOES this in Safari -- but opens it off the page.
> > > > > Clicking on refresh causes it to morph up into the visible range and
> > > > > stay...sometimes. Sometimes after that, you can click on a couple of
> > > > > links and it will stay visible...and then randomly it will vanish
> > > > > again. Clicking on links that do not have the mootools script attached
> > > > > is as likely to cause the problem as clicking the ones with the
> > > > > script. Removing the script from the page removes the problem.
>
> > > > > The site iswww.cathybeveridge.com. Cathy is my client, she's a
> > > > > children's writer. Much of her material is to be used by kids and by
> > > > > teachers. That's where the problem is coming in -- she has an
> > > > > unusually high percentage of her users coming in on Safari -- and
> > > > > Safari is useless. I'm going to try and go in later and somehow
> > > > > conditionally comment the script out for Safari, but I haven't had
> > > > > much use with that yet. Oh, I've gotten the page to display in Safari
> > > > > -- but then it crashes in FF and IE. <rolls eyes>
>
> > > > > Seriously, all whining aside, I need some help and would like to learn
> > > > > how to fix this. I know the layout is a little weird, but I don't
> > > > > think it is all THAT weird. She just didn't like scrolling, and this
> > > > > gives her an "opening page" effect without flash or other oddities.
>
> > > > > If the effect was consistent...I'd have a clue, but it isn't. I can
> > > > > replicate it because the div jumps off the page about 75% of the
> > > > > time...100% of the time on the first click, and will come back with a
> > > > > refresh 100% of the time...beyond that...it is up in the air -- or off
> > > > > the screen, I should say.
>
> > > > > I saw elsewhere a comment by someone that they fixed a similar problem
> > > > > by removing the item from the DOM and then adding it back in. I feel
> > > > > really stupid, but...how do you DO that? I think that might be the
> > > > > equivalent of the user hitting refresh, and if it is, then it would be
> > > > > my solution. But short of spending hours studying -- which I've
> > > > > already done and will continue to do...how do I DO that? And then
> > > > > there is the all-important question: is that the solution or have I
> > > > > missed something obvious like a . or ;? (Or a $ like I had once
> > > > > before...)
>
> > > > > I would be very grateful for any help you experts could give me. I'm
> > > > > clueless here.

Reply via email to