No, I guess there are some difference that would violate even a generic implementation. So I guess that can has already been opened.
On 15 Mar, 02:41, Guillermo Rauch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Sebastian Markbåge > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > My issue with that is that it would violate the Liskov substitution > > principle of object oriented design. The subclass would have a > > stronger contract than the superclass. Introducing this anti-pattern > > could open up a can of worms. > > Introducing ? Can you subtitute Fx.Tween with Fx.Morph ? > > -- > Guillermo Rauchhttp://devthought.com
