@nutron, can you elaborate on why not? @Sanford, of course it'd be redone with MT. You're missing the advantage of having portable docs. Ones that you do not require any software (aside from your browser) to run the docs.
Anyway, end of thread. This is not going anywhere. On Apr 7, 3:28 pm, Sanford Whiteman <[email protected]> wrote: > > At the very least the *index* shouldn't be done in the client (which was my > > point earlier). > > Mmm, yes... and I think that unless the client-side search is built as > a Moo class/es, rather than including someone else's JS search code > (which may in fact be very well-written, just not Moo-driven), it will > be markedly unimpressive and actually work against the concept that > Moo can do it all. > > And while I agree with Nutron that doing the indexing live is a bad > idea, if you *don't* use the client for indexing, it just seems like > make-work to use the client for anything other than posting a form. No > one will judge the official site for having a substantive back end, > y'know? Maybe use Jaxer with Moo to show off? > > --Sandy
