your absolutely right, thanks. On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Thierry bela nanga <bna...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hello,
> I think there must be a problem with preset with Lasso.Crop,
>
>
> they are not applied properly
>
> in the method setDefault
>
> the line
>
>
> this.move({ page : { x: d[2]+this.offset.left, y: d[3]+this.offset.top}});
>
> should be replaced by
>
>
> this.move({ page : { x: d[0] + d[2]+this.offset.left, y: d[1] +
> d[3]+this.offset.top}});
>
> otherwise the height and width won't be set properly
>
> anyway you did a wonderful job guy!
>
> [?]
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:23 PM, nwhite <changereal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree. The developer(s) of UvumiCrop were very wise to use the css clip
>> property, instead of using multiple divs to create the masking effect
>> (something I did in MooCrop ). I tried an alternative by using
>> background-position but clip was more consistant across browsers. Having
>> other libraries out makes everything better.
>>
>> If you really want to see some ninja skills with Drag, look at the source
>> of UvumiCrop. Wonderful use of the limits option.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Guillermo Rauch <rau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think it's good to have both type of plugins... the very complete ones,
>>> and the ones you can extend.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:59 PM, keif <god.dre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> To continue the conversation, I like that philosophy a bit more, and
>>>> it fits in with the idea of MooTools that way - I wish more classes
>>>> would take the ideology of being able to pick and choose the pieces
>>>> you need versus taking everything when you only need one aspect.
>>>>
>>>> Very cool, clean code.
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 26, 9:26 pm, nwhite <changereal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > I agree completely, and I most likely would pick Lasso.Crop for my
>>>> projects.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks. After all UvumiCrop is around 1000 lines right now. Lasso.Crop
>>>> is
>>>> > below 400 (including Lasso) and will most likely get more compact.
>>>> This is
>>>> > without the abstraction (extra classes) that UvumiCrop has. I want to
>>>> say
>>>> > again that UvumiCrop is high quality code, but I have different needs
>>>> and
>>>> > don't want the extra overhead.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:14 AM, nwhite <changereal...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > >> I think the UvumiCrop Tool is top notch. It really is a quality
>>>> piece of
>>>> > >> code.I differ in philosophy in that a piece of code should be as
>>>> simple as
>>>> > >> possible and extended later. UvumiCrop has everything in it. It
>>>> requires
>>>> > >> Assets, Drag etc. Lasso.Crop doesn't require anything outside of
>>>> > >> Elements.Dimensions. The code for dragging is highly optimized
>>>> instead of
>>>> > >> using the Drag library. In addition I don't feel that things like
>>>> preview
>>>> > >> and download belong in Lasso.Crop, these thing will probably come
>>>> but they
>>>> > >> won't be in the core Lasso.Crop it is up to the developer to
>>>> design, it's
>>>> > >> not forced on you.
>>>> >
>>>> > >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Steve Onnis <
>>>> st...@cfcentral.com.au>wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > >>> I like that one better
>>>> >
>>>> > >>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> > >>> From: mootools-users@googlegroups.com
>>>> > >>> [mailto:mootools-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of daKmoR
>>>> > >>> Sent: Friday, 27 February 2009 12:10 PM
>>>> > >>> To: MooTools Users
>>>> > >>> Subject: Re: MooCrop's replacement
>>>> >
>>>> > >>> from the usability viewpoint I really like UvumiTools Crop
>>>> > >>>http://tools.uvumi.com/crop.html
>>>> >
>>>> > >>> it has everything except the rupperband... :p
>>>> >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > Guillermo Rauch
>>>> > >http://devthought.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Guillermo Rauch
>>> http://devthought.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51
>
<<330.gif>>
