Oh, I see. In that case use Class.refactor and reference this.previous() On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Thierry bela nanga (via Nabble) < [email protected]<ml-user%[email protected]> > wrote:
> correct me if i'm wrong > but the this.parent will call the success method of Request not the > Request.JSON, > > I didn't extend the Request,JSON > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:07 PM, nutron > <anut...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3093813&i=0> > > wrote: > >> why not use this.parent? >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Thierry bela nanga (via Nabble) < >> ml-user%2b162868-1183848...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3093767&i=0> >> > wrote: >> >>> finally I got the solution: >>> >>> (function () { >>> var success = Request.JSON.prototype.success; >>> Request.JSON.prototype.success = function (text) { >>> try { success.bind(this)(text); } >>> catch(e) { >>> this.onFailure(e); >>> throw e; >>> } >>> } >>> })(); >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:52 AM, nutron >>> <anut...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3093446&i=0> >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> The important thing is that the Core is designed to provide you the >>>> tools to do what you need, not to add as much flexibility as possible for >>>> all use cases. Your use case is the edge case (Request.HTML is used 99% of >>>> the time to update the DOM with HTML fetched from the server). Even though >>>> your case is an edge case, there's an easy way to manage it: don't have the >>>> class evaluate the scripts and then do it when it fits your logic flow. >>>> >>>> 2009/5/24 Fábio Costa (via Nabble) >>>> <ml-user%2b98816-1760363...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967576&i=0> >>>> > >>>> >>>> Thats cool, but why not increase flexibility if it is something that >>>>> makes sense? >>>>> And another thing that should be discussed is the request.HTML sometime >>>>> you dont need all of its functions, some times you just need the response >>>>> text and the javascript for example... i thought that there could be >>>>> options >>>>> to set what response you want to get... ust some thoughts... >>>>> >>>>> Fábio Miranda Costa >>>>> Engenheiro de Computação >>>>> http://meiocodigo.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Aaron Newton >>>>> <anut...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=0> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Catching poorly formatted JSON would require parsing the JSON string >>>>>> before evaluating it, which means basically making a JS parser for >>>>>> MooTools, which I think is overkill. It's your job to return well >>>>>> formatted JSON. >>>>>> >>>>>> As for when scripts are evaluated (which started this thread), the >>>>>> best way to do this is to set evalScripts to false, then add your >>>>>> onSuccess logic as an event and call $exec(javascript) like so: >>>>>> >>>>>> var r = new Requst.HTML({ >>>>>> ...various options... >>>>>> evalScripts: false, >>>>>> onSuccess: function(tree, elements, html, js) { >>>>>> ...your operations >>>>>> $exec(js); >>>>>> } >>>>>> }); >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On May 23, 6:35 am, fabiomcosta >>>>>> <fabiomco...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=1>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > Thierry, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > i think its impossible to catch the error on the script evaluation >>>>>> > because of the current method of evaluating globally the scripts. >>>>>> > But maybe someone has a solution... >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On May 22, 3:46 pm, Fábio Costa >>>>>> > <fabiomco...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=2>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > Could be really useful too! >>>>>> > > And i think that the onException is not that useful, i would like >>>>>> to know if >>>>>> > > anybody have ever used it... >>>>>> > > I mean, its your headers, you are setting them... why should they >>>>>> return >>>>>> > > errors? >>>>>> > > I don't see why i need this but if someone have ever used or >>>>>> needed it >>>>>> > > please report... >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > Fábio Miranda Costa >>>>>> > > Engenheiro de Computaçãohttp://meiocodigo.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Thierry bela nanga >>>>>> > > <bna...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=3> >>>>>> >wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > > exactly, >>>>>> > > > if an error occur, there is not really a way to handle it. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > > 2009/5/22 Fábio Costa >>>>>> > > > <fabiomco...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=4> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >> You mean like when the evaluation of the response gets an >>>>>> error, right? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >> Fábio Miranda Costa >>>>>> > > >> Engenheiro de Computação >>>>>> > > >>http://meiocodigo.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Thierry bela nanga < >>>>>> bna...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=5> >>>>>> >wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>> I want to be able to handle error when mootools evaluate the >>>>>> response >>>>>> > > >>> in Request.JSON.success, not only when the request is being >>>>>> done, >>>>>> > > >>> oherwise the overlay remains on the page and the only thing to >>>>>> do is to >>>>>> > > >>> reload the page :( >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>> 2009/5/22 Fábio Costa >>>>>> > > >>> <fabiomco...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=6> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>> But the onFailure is fired when an error occurs on the >>>>>> request, i don't >>>>>> > > >>>> get your point.... :S >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>> Fábio Miranda Costa >>>>>> > > >>>> Engenheiro de Computação >>>>>> > > >>>>http://meiocodigo.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Thierry bela nanga < >>>>>> bna...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=7> >>>>>> >wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>>> I'll add something to this, >>>>>> > > >>>>> I'm using Request.JSON to send data, if the request uses >>>>>> POST, then I >>>>>> > > >>>>> recover the page with a blocking overlay that should be >>>>>> removed at the end >>>>>> > > >>>>> of the request. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>>> when en error occurs while evaluating the response in >>>>>> > > >>>>> Request.JSON.success, I have no way to handle it and the >>>>>> user only have to >>>>>> > > >>>>> press F5 to get out of that situation >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>>> I think propose the onFailure event should be fired there >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>>> 2009/5/22 Fábio Costa >>>>>> > > >>>>> <fabiomco...@...<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2967534&i=8> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>>> Don't you guys think that the scripts inside the HTML >>>>>> request should >>>>>> > > >>>>>> be evaluated after the onSuccess and onComplete events? >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Im asking this because sometimes i need the HTML inside the >>>>>> received >>>>>> > > >>>>>> response to be inject in the DOM before actually evaluating >>>>>> the script tags >>>>>> > > >>>>>> into the response. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> evalScripts could be a string like 'after' and 'before', >>>>>> and of >>>>>> > > >>>>>> course, for backwards compatibility, if you put true it >>>>>> would eval the >>>>>> > > >>>>>> script before the onComplete and onSuccess events. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Fábio Miranda Costa >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Engenheiro de Computação >>>>>> > > >>>>>>http://meiocodigo.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>>> -- >>>>>> > > >>>>> fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>> -- >>>>>> > > >>> fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > > -- >>>>>> > > > fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The MooTools Tutorial: www.mootorial.com Clientcide: www.clientcide.com >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> View this message in context: Re: [Moo] Re: Request and >>>> evalScripts<http://n2.nabble.com/-Moo--Request-and-evalScripts-tp2957436p2967576.html> >>>> Sent from the MooTools Users mailing list >>>> archive<http://n2.nabble.com/MooTools-Users-f660466.html>at Nabble.com. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51 >>> >> >> The MooTools Tutorial: www.mootorial.com Clientcide: www.clientcide.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> View this message in context: Re: [Moo] Re: Request and >> evalScripts<http://n2.nabble.com/-Moo--Request-and-evalScripts-tp2957436p3093767.html> >> Sent from the MooTools Users mailing list >> archive<http://n2.nabble.com/MooTools-Users-f660466.html>at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- > fax : (+33) 08 26 51 94 51 > > > ------------------------------ > View message @ > http://n2.nabble.com/-Moo--Request-and-evalScripts-tp2957436p3093813.html > To start a new topic under MooTools Users, email > [email protected]<ml-node%[email protected]> > To unsubscribe from MooTools Users, click here< (link removed) >. > > > ----- The MooTools Tutorial: http://www.mootorial.com www.mootorial.com Clientcide: http://www.clientcide.com www.clientcide.com -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/-Moo--Request-and-evalScripts-tp2957436p3093829.html Sent from the MooTools Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
