Wow, that is quite cool. Thanks! Daniel
On 2009-12-03, at 3/December, 2:02 PM, Fábio M. Costa wrote: > thats more correct: > > http://mooshell.net/Uqbba/1/ > > -- > Fábio Miranda Costa > Solucione Sistemas > Engenheiro de interfaces > > > 2009/12/3 Fábio M. Costa <[email protected]> > i dont think you could do this to all the function definitions (correct me if > im wrong) but you could create a function at the Function prototype to do > this. > > Something like: > > http://mooshell.net/Uqbba/ > > > > > -- > Fábio Miranda Costa > Solucione Sistemas > Engenheiro de interfaces > > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:34 AM, noiv <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I often found this pattern in my functions: > > function doSomething(params){ > try { > // Do Something > } catch (e) {catchError ("doSomething", e, params) ;} > } > > catchError() simply pretty-prints the error message to the console. > > Is there a possibility to extend all user function definitions > automatically with this try/catch pattern? Or have I missed something > even more useful? > > --noiv > > >
