There was a console statement left in accidentally in the last release. Look
for a release candidate for the next release this week.

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:10 AM, ghazal <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> I have a strange pb with "sortable".
> Working with 2 macs (one OSX 10.4.X, the other, OSX 10.5.X and FF
> 3.6.10), "sortable" doesn't work if Firebug isn't activated, in both
> cases.
> Once it is, it's OK.
> Tested this within and outside jsfiddle environment.
> Safari is OK , though.
>
>
> On Sep 27, 11:29 pm, hairbo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > thx.
> >
> > On Sep 27, 4:24 pm, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > yes, but you can easily add your own or overwrite it.
> >
> > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:21 PM, hairbo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Okay, one more question (well...for now).
> >
> > > > The default "string" parser, if I'm not mistaken, is case sensitive,
> > > > so lower case letters are sorted before upper case?  For example:
> >
> > > >http://jsfiddle.net/wRQXp/
> >
> > > > Is this by design?
> >
> > > > On Sep 27, 4:15 pm, hairbo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Bless you.
> >
> > > > > On Sep 27, 4:11 pm, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Ah. you've found a bug!
> >
> > > > > > It requires an element at the moment; won't work with a string
> (the
> > > > id).
> > > > > > I'll put together a fix for the next release. In the mean time:
> >
> > > > > >http://jsfiddle.net/cDyjz/2/
> >
> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:49 PM, hairbo <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > According to the HtmlTable docs, you should be able to sort an
> > > > > > > existing HTML table using the HtmlTable function.  I hope I'm
> just
> > > > > > > doing something silly, but I can't make it work.  Here's a very
> > > > simple
> > > > > > > jsfiddle example, with what I thought would be enough to make
> it
> > > > > > > happen:
> >
> > > > > > >http://jsfiddle.net/cDyjz/
> >
> > > > > > > My assumption is that if I click on the headers that the
> underlying
> > > > > > > columns would sort.  My assumption appears to be wrong...
> >
> > > > > > > Any help would be appreciated.
> >
> > > > > > > Thanks.
>

Reply via email to