MooShell is now back on and in read-only mode. If you have important shells on it, it would be best to move them over jsFiddle. Sooner or later MooShell will go off again and permanently.

Thanks Piotr for the read-only modification.

- Djamil

Rolf -nl wrote:
Good work, having mooshell still around is only confusing to most.
Maybe in time mootools.net/shell should just redirect or implement
jsfiddle 1:1.

Instead of the 404 now you could maybe redirect to an information page
telling people to contact you (or fill in a form) about a shell not
being up anymore so it'll be changed to jsfiddle in 48 hours (I dunno,
something). This way others that posted to /shell in some forum or
whatever know what to do as well (instead of just getting the 404).
Sometimes I think only a small percentage of moo-users (and potential /
shell users) read this group.

On Sep 26, 10:33 am, Piotr Zalewa<[email protected]>  wrote:
  I tried yesterday, but failed
is not as easy as resources here and there have different ids and names
I'll keep going

On 09/24/10 18:37, Ryan Florence wrote:





I've been trying to close some tickets in lighthouse and have to just skip the 
ones with mooshell demos.
Piotr, should I just send you a bunch of slugs or what?
On Sep 24, 2010, at 10:30 AM, batman42ca wrote:
Have the mooshell examples been moved to jsfiddle yet? I have a
mooshell example as part of a lighthouse bug report:
http://mootools.net/jN7N7/
... and now my example is no longer accessible.
On Sep 21, 7:00 am, Piotr Zalewa<[email protected]>  wrote:
  That's actually a very good idea
it would have to remove the /shell/ from the url
I'm asdding the mooshell examples to jsfiddle today/tomorrow
zalun
--
blog  http://piotr.zalewa.info
jobs  http://webdev.zalewa.info
twit  http://twitter.com/zalun
face  http://facebook.com/zaloon

--
- Djamil

Reply via email to