thanks all for discussing this. I have pulled the fix by Sean for Core
1.3.1

On Dec 1, 8:00 pm, Gafa <sfreder...@ireland.com> wrote:
> ok, thanks
>
> It's important because as the users/developers of Mootools upgrade
> their framework same use functionality should exist unless otherwise
> documented as with the many new features of mootools 1.3
>
> Gafa
>
> On Nov 30, 5:15 pm, Sean McArthur <sean.mons...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > So, I was largely wrong in whats happening behind the scenes. checked is
> > actually handled by setting the property directly, but defaultChecked is
> > also set in the constructor for IE, and defaultChecked was calling
> > setAttribute with the string false. I've pushed a fix, but note that my
> > other statements are still correct: passing null will call removeAttribute,
> > or not set either checked nor defaultChecked.
>
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Sanford Whiteman <
>
> > sa...@cypressintegrated.com> wrote:
> > > > But  Gafa's  point  is that it used to support booleans and abstracted
> > > > dot-property, then changed.
>
> > > And IMO the clearest parallel to
>
> > >    name : value
>
> > > is  dot-property, since the same format accounts for both cases, while
> > > setAttribute/removeAttribute would be better abstracted something like
>
> > >    name : value
> > >    !name
>
> > > which is obviously not supportable using object literals.  The null is
> > > not  something  that has much place in DOM and I think it's strange to
> > > encourage  it  in  frameworkland.   As  you probably know, even though
> > > within  browsers  set(value,null)  ~=  remove(value),  this is only by
> > > happy  accident  and  *not*  standard  (it's  deprecated by individual
> > > browser  vendors, but isn't even in the spec enough to be deprecated).
> > > When  you  more clearly follow the DOM spec, there would be no obvious
> > > way   for   set(value,null)   to   be   coerced   into  remove,  since
> > > set(value,null)  could  just  as  well be coerced to set(value,"null")
> > > which is not the same as remove.
>
> > > BTW,  I  do  see  the dot-property emulation as working in IE8/Moo1.3,
> > > though not in IE7/Moo1.3!
>
> > > -- S.

Reply via email to