i am with Sandy ... but i think you are not sending your Logging
Request to a zerobyte file but to the logging Script? So it is up to
you / the script what or even IF there is a return or just a status
header like (in PHP)
<?php
header('HTTP/1.1 204 No Content');
exit(0);
?>
Playing russian roulette with the http connection status from within
your XHR Request is by far the last way to focus on ...
On 16 Jan., 20:16, Sanford Whiteman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The files actually exist on the server. I just don’t want to use the
> > bandwidth to return the data. I have moved files into the cloud to
> > reduce my datacentre bandwidth costs but i still want to keep the
> > logging happening on the server
>
> I can't think of a worse, less meaningful/reliable choice for logging
> than what you've described -- playing a guessing-game with an HTTP
> connection.
>
> Send a request to a zero-length file (you can even send back a 204),
> passing the logging data in the query string.
>
> -- S.
