sorry that's socket.js not server. on mobile now. :)
On Friday, March 21, 2014, Dimitar Christoff <christ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> found their error. server.js line 263 for var in without hasOwnProperty
> check.
>
> change to `if (seqFn.hasOwnProperty(i) && 'function' == typeof seqFn[i])
> {` and it works fine
>
> On Friday, March 21, 2014, Dimitar Christoff
> <christ...@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','christ...@gmail.com');>>
> wrote:
>
>> hrm - not sure. looks like a mootools extend is causing an issue in
>> the way it's being used when Array.each is coming on..
>>
>> it's trying to implement the sparse [ undefined ] being passed in here
>> forEach function Array() { [native code] } [ undefined ]
>>
>> /Users/coda/temp/
>> moo.io/node_modules/mootools/lib/mootools-core-1.4.5-server.js:222
>> return method.apply(item, slice.call(arguments, 1));
>> ^
>> TypeError: #<XHR> is not a function
>> at Array.forEach (native)
>> at Function.implement [as forEach]
>> (/Users/coda/temp/
>> moo.io/node_modules/mootools/lib/mootools-core-1.4.5-server.js:222:17)
>> at Array.implement.each
>> (/Users/coda/temp/
>> moo.io/node_modules/mootools/lib/mootools-core-1.4.5-server.js:339:9)
>> at XHR.Socket.setupSendCallback
>> (/Users/coda/temp/
>> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/socket.js:264:21
>> )
>> at XHR.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:126:20)
>> at XHR.Polling.onPollRequest
>> (/Users/coda/temp/
>> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/transports/polling.js:97:8
>> )
>> at XHR.Polling.onRequest
>> (/Users/coda/temp/
>> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/transports/polling.js:53:10
>> )
>> at XHR.onRequest
>> (/Users/coda/temp/
>> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/transports/polling-xhr.js:47:33
>> )
>> at Server.handshake
>> (/Users/coda/temp/
>> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/server.js:232:13
>> )
>> at Server.handleRequest
>> (/Users/coda/temp/
>> moo.io/node_modules/socket.io/node_modules/engine.io/lib/server.js:176:10
>> )
>>
>> Process finished with exit code 1
>>
>> As an experiment, I replaced the mootools code with primish and it
>> works fine... (`npm i primish` first)
>> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9d8140fbf69efc468638
>>
>> So he XHR object somewhere messes up - I may have time to look at it
>> later but it does not sound like a mootools issue, probably it's
>> passing through non-enumerables or something silly.
>>
>> On 21 March 2014 04:59, utan <vcomputado...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Sure, no problem.. hope he figure what the problem is..
>> >
>> > If not then just let me know how to pass u credentials.
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > ---
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "MooTools Users" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to mootools-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dimitar Christoff
>>
>> "JavaScript is to JAVA what hamster is to ham"
>> @D_mitar - https://github.com/DimitarChristoff
>>
>
>
> --
> Dimitar Christoff
>
> "JavaScript is to JAVA what hamster is to ham"
> @D_mitar - https://github.com/DimitarChristoff
>
--
Dimitar Christoff
"JavaScript is to JAVA what hamster is to ham"
@D_mitar - https://github.com/DimitarChristoff
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MooTools Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to mootools-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
