|
Bruce and Ira,
I was hoping to hear from more people on the issue of "why is more better?"
but no one seems to care much, since there have only been two responses in the 3
days since I posed the question. I personally feel there is way too much
inventory being offered at one time -- by everyone (not just Bruce). But I also
feel that because it is Bruce who is consistently offering so many more
items per week than anyone else, week after week, that he is "setting the
standard" and other feels they have to put up as much as possible "just to have
a chance of competing".
I can't prove it, but if my memory serves, about 3 or 4 years ago Bruce was
regularly offering 400 to 700 items per week, not 700 to 1200. He was just as
successful then as he is now. In fact, when I browse through Bruce's database
and compare prices between then and now, I believe I see an overall price
DECREASE from then to now, even within Bruce's own matrix -- and that
trend has certainly been true for other dealers. Is there any dealer out there
who feels they are getting better pricing now than they were 4 or 5 years ago?
Yes, the economy has weakened some, but the single biggest change you can point
to is the huge increase in the number of posters being offered every week.
I thinks this is a vicious cycle that has lead to overall lower prices. As
I buyer I shouldn't complain -- except that as a long-time buyer I have seen
posters I gladly paid $50 to $200 for about five or ten years ago
continue to drop in price to the point where they can now regularly be had for
$15 to $75 today. That's the two-edged sword that those buyers who advocate
lower prices seem to be missing. Of course, if you just started buying recently,
then it has been all to your advantage -- unless the trend continues and your
great bargain $30 poster ends up being worth $3, five or ten years from
now.
Of course, I'm talking poster prices "overall" here -- everyone knows
that the very popular and extremely desirable and/or rare posters have continued
to climb. But in most cases I think even for most of them this huge inventory
has been a restraining factor on prices... maybe even a depressing factor in
some cases.
I wasn't accusing Bruce or any one individual of "ruining prices" when
I posed the question What I was looking for was to see if dealers were
even interested in considering the concept of detente in this huge volume war
that has been raging on eBay for so many years now. I guess
not.
But even as a current buyer who loves the low prices on the great items
that I have recently added to my collection, I find the sheer numbers
overwhelming and disturbing. I can't help thinking that a 50% reduction in the
weekly volume would still provide all the variety anyone needs and would lead to
more stable and perhaps gently rising prices. It would also conserve dealer's
inventory and mean they would have to work less. That would be such a bad
thing?
-- JR
|
Title: Message

