I personally prefer grading systems that use numbers like "7 out of 10"
because all of these adjectives... good... very good... fine... mint... near
this or near that... have different meanings to different people.
We all know that in movie poster collecting these days that "very good" can
mean just about anything, from "man, this poster is in great condition" to
"folded badly by Freddy Kruger..." Grading on a scale of 1 to 10 (or C1 to C10
if you want to emulate comic-book grading), isn't perfect, but it does seem to
add a bit more impartiality to the process. But most sellers still cling to the
adjectives.
Personally, I have never liked seeing of the word "mint" used in
descriptions of anything except food.
Mint originally comes from coin collecting (I think, or perhaps stamp
collecting?), where coins are actually "minted" at the U.S. Mint. A coin which
is never put into circulation but purchased by the collector directly from the
Mint was termed in "mint" condition (meaning it was never out there bumping
around in the real world in people's pockets, not even for a few minutes).
Now the term is applied to all kinds of collectibles and for practical
purposes means "in like-new condition" because there are very few
collectibles around whereby you can truly know they came straight from the
source without going through some handling and use, even if minor -- so almost
all collectibles have been in circulation at least a little bit, at one time or
another.
But I suppose "mint" will always have that cachet.. that allure... that je
ne sai quois which entices some bidders to pony up for a big premium. It also
goes good on roast lamb.
-- JR
(send PayPal donations to the MOPO fund pool using this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
|
- Re: [MOPO] Am I Crazy JR
- Re: [MOPO] Am I Crazy pj angel
- Re: [MOPO] Am I Crazy Movielegends