> Bruce H. gives you extremely
fine pictures and tells it like it is
Now, I've always wondered why on Earth everyone praises
dealers for doing this (in fact, it should probably be the
opposite)??? They don't give you a hi-res photo so you can see defects
more clearly. In fact, it has nothing to do with the buyer at all.
The only reason they give you hi-res pics is so that they don't have to
grade any posters anymore! It's to save themselves a boat-load of time
and money - so they can grade a poster in 2 seconds - not 2
minutes this way (it's pretty easy to grade a poster when you only have two
possible grades). And, if they don't give you an accurate grade - you
can't complain when you get the poster (you had hi-res pics, right). It's
a way of automating the process, like eBay is continually doing, that keeps
their customers at arms-length. It's the internet version of a
phone-tree where you press buttons for half an hour before being abruptly
disconnected without ever speaking to anyone. How that's in the
buyer's best interest, I'll never know...
High resolution pics are only half of the whole picture - not the
whole thing...
Hi-res pics cost no extra money (except for increased bandwidth,
which is negligible now), take no extra time, no extra effort - and provide the
buyer with a lot less information than they were used to (with a medium-res pic
and an accurate description).
Now, how about praising sellers who have hi-res pictures AND
detailed descriptions!?!
Cheers,
Bob
|
- Re: [MOPO] is this "FAIR TO GOOD" ??? Bob Brooks
- Re: [MOPO] is this "FAIR TO GOOD" ??... Claude Litton
- Re: [MOPO] is this "FAIR TO GOOD" ... Sean Linkenback