----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:52
PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] This does not go
unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid
Andrea,
Thanks, I really appreciate your stepping up in public to say something
against Susan's unwarranted and vicious 24-hour long attack. Yeah, it's
obvious to some people (who have not spoken publicly) that Scott should
never have let her back in in the first place and should have taken this
right-out-of-the-gate violation of the rules in her very first posts as a
perfect reason to fix that mistake and remove her. He told me he did send
her... privately... a "stern warning" that she couldn't do that sort of thing
anymore. So, you may be safe on MOPO (for a while)... but watch your step if
you participate in NS4GE.
What Scott doesn't get is that a private warning -- when she had spent 24
hours blasting me in public with 6 separate messages -- just doesn't cut it
for me. I refrained from answering her public lies and accusations about me
because I thought he would *at least* publicly reprimand her. By not doing
that, he basically lets all of her public comments stand unchallenged, which
forced me to respond to them, which is exactly what I didn't want to do.
But the unkindest cut for me was when his only public action was to send
out a "Friendly Reminder" and lump me in with her, as though I were at least
as much at fault in the one-way "exchange" as she was -- no, that's adding
insult to injury.
I am a bit perplexed... I would have expected at least a few more people
to publicly comment while this was going on... at least a couple of messages
along the lines of "Cool it, Susan, this is inappropriate" or "What's
your problem, girl?" or at least something like "We really don't
appreciate this kind of language on MOPO". But aside from you, no
one did even that much and that really cuts the legs out of my
feeling that MOPO is worth spending any time on right now.
Later,
-- JR
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:29
Subject: Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of
necessity, I'm afraid
I don't blame you, J.R. When reading your
post and re-reading hers, it's clear you were not to blame.
Susan is the reason I left style-b.
Actually, I just stopped the emails like you're doing here. She recently
booted me off. I received two emails the same day, one right after
the other. The first said something about needing to post or
renewing...I didn't bother reading, quite frankly. When I realized
who was behind it, I automatically deleted it. The other said I was booted
off. Quite a relief!
I couldn't care less. Personally, I want
nothing to do with her. Scott suggested I simply delete or ignore her
messages; which I shall do.
But truly,imo, Scott should have tossed
her. IMO, she's just seeking attention and I find that pathetic.
I don't think Susan has it in her to abide by the
rules. We should have a bet to see how long she can make
it!
I'll bet she can't resist pounding me now.
I won't know though, because anything from her will never again make it to my
eyes.
As my grandmother would have said,
"Feh!"
Andrea