JR,
Would you please, could you please, kindly drop it? It would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks,
Gordon
---- JR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrea,
>
> Thanks, I really appreciate your stepping up in public to say something
> against Susan's unwarranted and vicious 24-hour long attack. Yeah, it's
> obvious to some people (who have not spoken publicly) that Scott should never
> have let her back in in the first place and should have taken this
> right-out-of-the-gate violation of the rules in her very first posts as a
> perfect reason to fix that mistake and remove her. He told me he did send
> her... privately... a "stern warning" that she couldn't do that sort of thing
> anymore. So, you may be safe on MOPO (for a while)... but watch your step if
> you participate in NS4GE.
>
> What Scott doesn't get is that a private warning -- when she had spent 24
> hours blasting me in public with 6 separate messages -- just doesn't cut it
> for me. I refrained from answering her public lies and accusations about me
> because I thought he would *at least* publicly reprimand her. By not doing
> that, he basically lets all of her public comments stand unchallenged, which
> forced me to respond to them, which is exactly what I didn't want to do.
>
> But the unkindest cut for me was when his only public action was to send out
> a "Friendly Reminder" and lump me in with her, as though I were at least as
> much at fault in the one-way "exchange" as she was -- no, that's adding
> insult to injury.
>
> I am a bit perplexed... I would have expected at least a few more people to
> publicly comment while this was going on... at least a couple of messages
> along the lines of "Cool it, Susan, this is inappropriate" or "What's your
> problem, girl?" or at least something like "We really don't appreciate this
> kind of language on MOPO". But aside from you, no one did even that much and
> that really cuts the legs out of my feeling that MOPO is worth spending any
> time on right now.
>
> Later,
>
> -- JR
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Freedom Lover
> To: JR ; MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:29
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm
> afraid
>
>
> I don't blame you, J.R. When reading your post and re-reading hers, it's
> clear you were not to blame.
>
> Susan is the reason I left style-b. Actually, I just stopped the emails like
> you're doing here. She recently booted me off. I received two emails the
> same day, one right after the other. The first said something about needing
> to post or renewing...I didn't bother reading, quite frankly. When I
> realized who was behind it, I automatically deleted it. The other said I was
> booted off. Quite a relief!
>
> I couldn't care less. Personally, I want nothing to do with her. Scott
> suggested I simply delete or ignore her messages; which I shall do.
>
> But truly,imo, Scott should have tossed her. IMO, she's just seeking
> attention and I find that pathetic.
>
> I don't think Susan has it in her to abide by the rules. We should have a
> bet to see how long she can make it!
>
> I'll bet she can't resist pounding me now. I won't know though, because
> anything from her will never again make it to my eyes.
>
> As my grandmother would have said, "Feh!"
>
> Andrea
>
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>
> Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
