Howdy y'all,

Interesting interview by the learned Demarest, which
eventually leads to absurd absolutes.

He inserts 3 facts ... ("Demarest expressed
frustration at many aspects of the movie, including
what he expressed as egregious errors regarding issues
such as the Maya's jewelry, the size of their temple
and the description of human sacrifice".) ... then
plays the race card to support his opinion ... nice.

The last statement of the article may have been better
placed as the first statement.

I did not see Passion of the Christ.

I plan to see Apocalypto (a movie, not a documentary).

ad


Note: forwarded message attached.



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
--- Begin Message --- I managed to avoid PASSION OF THE CHRIST and I don't think I'll need to see this piece of junk either. Mad Mel. Here's a piece from THE TENNESEAN about Vanderbilt University archaeologist Arthur Demarest who knows a little bit more about the Maya than Gibson does. What is amusing is that Gibson concocts all this stuff while posing as a moralist.
Give me a B R E A K .

K.


By MICHAELA JACKSON
Staff Writer

Nashville theatergoers are flocking to see Mel Gibson's latest movie, Apocalypto, but Vanderbilt archaeologist Arthur Demarest came away unimpressed after seeing the movie Saturday night.

In fact, he was downright indignant.

"I'm sorry that I brought you to this," said Demarest, who assigned two of his Vanderbilt classes, one on the collapse of civilizations and one on the Maya, to screen the movie as part of their class work.

"It had nothing to do with the Maya. Nothing."

Demarest is a renowned expert on the Maya civilization, having published three books on the subject. He also contributes to publications such as National Geographic. He is based out of Guatemala and said he spends more time there than Nashville. He works with modern-day Maya on developmental projects.

Demarest expressed frustration at many aspects of the movie, including what he expressed as egregious errors regarding issues such as the Maya's jewelry, the size of their temple and the description of human sacrifice.

"Why did they go to all that trouble to get even the littlest details wrong?" he said.

"I figured the thing would be politically incorrect, but because they had archaeological advising that the technical details would be right."

Professor says film racist

Demarest also cried foul because, in his opinion, the entire Maya nation is stereotyped in a way that constitutes racism.

The movie focuses on a man who is captured by the Maya to be offered as a human sacrifice but escapes.

"Some are saying it's good and some are saying it's bad. What if you made this kind of movie about any other culture?" he said. "It was amazingly racist.

"The Maya leaders are going to go nuts. I don't know how they can do this. It's just because it's not a known ethnicity."

He took issue with the fact that, in his mind, the movie presents an overly simplified situation that sets up civilization as evil and unfettered life in the jungle as pure.

"But you learned from this that civilization is bad, and all that learning stuff is bad, so I hope that you've learned from this to wander off from Vanderbilt, not even finish your exams and go off into the woods and hunt pigs sadistically," he told his students.

Demarest's students shared his disdain for the historical treatment of the Maya people, but some of them were able to appreciate the movie as just that, a movie.

"I enjoyed it as a cinematic work, absolutely," said junior Terence Christian.

"(Gibson's) a master storyteller." But, he added, the film is historically inaccurate and should not be the basis for understanding the Maya civilization.

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to