Hypothetically musing ...

Scenario numero uno ... Let's say you're the seller, a
bidder wins the item and then replies that he
completely forgot about his pregnant wife that is in
the hospital, and triplets are due any minute ... he
states that he cannot pay and wants a mulligan for his
faux pas. Furthermore, he implies that he will
reciprocate if your neg button finger gets twitchy.
Researching his feedback, you note 2 other recent negs
in the bidder's history for non payment.

Now ... as the seller on eBay, you've got a feedback
history that is untainted with over 2,000 positive
feedbacks, hell ... make it 5,631 postive.

Do you issue the cretin a pass to preserve your
unblemished record, so you can still maintain a
quasi-pseudo 100% positive feedback record ... or ...
will you accept the red badge of courage?

Watcha gonna do?

Scenario numero dos ... flip the roles ... as a buyer
you've got 1100+ greenies with nary a red spot. You're
the winning bidder and the seller states that the USPS
center is too far (15 miles one way) to travel to pick
up your money order that you posted certified as
payment for item won on eBay. You file a seller non
performance thingy with ebay and consider a neg to
boot. (BTW ... This scenario did occur to me)

Again ... watcha gonna do ... boy?

My answers:

Scenario #1 ... yes
Scenario #2 ... yes

allenday


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato? 
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
 

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to