Well, it's SOMETHING like that!

Actually, it's 1.75%.

k.
On Jun 13, 2010, at 4:32 PM, Richard Halegua Comic Art wrote:

> oh cmon Kirby, "your reckless oil company"?
> what BP does has nothing to do with the British people
> some 38% is owned by Americans
> 
> hey wait.... where did you get 27% the Kuwaitis??
> 38% US ownership & 45% UK ownership is in itself 83%
> 
> 
> At 02:25 PM 6/13/2010, you wrote:
>> Adrian,
>> 
>> Your reckless little oil company is 27% owned by the Kuwaitis!  I'm sure
>> Osama Bin Lube is at the bottom of it (no pun intended) somewhere or another.
>> 
>> We may take your 12% dividends and build a soccer stadium with it.
>> 
>> K.
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 13, 2010, at 3:17 PM, jboh...@aol.com wrote:
>> 
>>> Thas More like it.
>>> 
>>> I gather the Pres has apologised to us for the Brit bashing as BP is 
>>> Anglo-American...Oil be coming round the mountain...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Richard Halegua Comic Art <sa...@comic-art.com>
>>> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>>> Sent: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:15
>>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] OT; BLIGH ME, GUVNOR
>>> 
>>> do you mean our
>>> 
>>> B P
>>> r  a
>>> i  r
>>> t  t
>>> i  n
>>> s e
>>> h  r
>>>    s
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> At 01:06 PM 6/13/2010, Kirby McDaniel wrote:
>>>> Quite right; we can always learn something from our former owners!
>>>> 
>>>> K.
>>>> On Jun 13, 2010, at 2:28 PM, jboh...@aol.com wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Might I point out to our colonial cousins it is Blimey! Not Bligh Me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Richard Halegua Comic Art <sa...@comic-art.com>
>>>>> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>>>>> Sent: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:26
>>>>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] OT; BLIGH ME, GUVNOR
>>>>> 
>>>>> I agree David
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bridge on the River Kwai being a good example. No happy ending there
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> At 11:38 AM 6/12/2010, David Kusumoto wrote:
>>>>>> I have always felt that Bolt's screenplay in "Lawrence" is not just 
>>>>>> good, but spectacular.  There's a reason why it remains in the top ten 
>>>>>> lists of the greatest films ever made.  It is so far ahead of its time 
>>>>>> with its ambiguous portrait of Lawrence that it feels timeless and 
>>>>>> undated.  In fact, the parts that linger on the visual majesty of the 
>>>>>> desert or the battle scenes sometimes drags down the pacing.  I've 
>>>>>> always felt (and I know there is debate about this), that despite my 
>>>>>> love for Gregory Peck, who won Best Actor that year, that Peter 
>>>>>> O'Toole's performance in Lawrence is simply electric and drop-dead 
>>>>>> perfect.  And what an ending!  It disappoints many, but it is an 
>>>>>> anti-climax that is faithful to the integrity of where Lawrence's story 
>>>>>> HAD to go.  Can you imagine some corn-ball U.S.-tinkering happy ending 
>>>>>> tacked on to make Lawrence's efforts uplifting and redemptive?  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A generalization, but I think the Brits have a knack for making 
>>>>>> wonderfully written films that - as I wrote last year - are masked when 
>>>>>> they're budgeted by American dollars and cast (e.g., Anthony Quinn, who 
>>>>>> was a major star here in 1962) to draw an American audience.  
>>>>>> Astoundingly, the country-of-origin and first printing of "Lawrence" is 
>>>>>> the U.S.A. like "Bridge over the River Kwai" (which was cast budgeted to 
>>>>>> include William Holden) - despite being thoroughly British in tone and 
>>>>>> sensibility.  Hence my obsession with "country-of-origin" posters which 
>>>>>> I treat like first edition books regardless of less than attractive art. 
>>>>>>  I'm bitter that the beginning of Carol Reed's "The Third Man" was 
>>>>>> butchered by Selznick when it was released in the U.S.; the British 
>>>>>> version is superior.  But at least in the case of the wonderfully 
>>>>>> written "Third Man" -- the country-of-origin is rightfully the U.K.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:57:20 -0500
>>>>>> From: brucehershen...@gmail.com 
>>>>>> Subject: Re: OT; BLIGH ME, GUVNOR
>>>>>> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think Bolt started the screenplay for The Bounty, but had a stroke and 
>>>>>> the eventual film contains little of his original writing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I imagine the movie with a screenplay by the Bolt of the early 1960s, 
>>>>>> and it would have been wonderful.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I first read the three novels by Charles Nordhoff and James Norman Hall 
>>>>>> (Mutiny on the Bounty, Men Against the Sea, and Pitcairn's Island) as a 
>>>>>> teen, and I know there is still a great series of movies (or an epic TV 
>>>>>> mini-series) waiting to be made of the entire story (only parts of which 
>>>>>> were addressed in the earlier versions).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Kirby McDaniel <ki...@movieart.net> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> He also co-wrote the script for THE BOUNTY (1984), the mutiny on the HMS 
>>>>>> Bounty story, which David Lean had always wantedto film, but was never 
>>>>>> able to get financed.
>>>>>> This film takes a fuller look at the BOUNTY epic, and is enjoyable 
>>>>>> enough, directed by Roger Donaldson.  But one can only imagine that tale 
>>>>>> with the Lean camera and editing synergy and perfectionist sensibility.  
>>>>>> Maybe the
>>>>>> financiers remembered all too well the MGM experience with the Brando 
>>>>>> version.  I have always liked that version.
>>>>>> LEAN went on to make A PASSAGE TO INDIA, a thoroughly wonderful film, in 
>>>>>> my opinion.  I think that'sout on BLU - RAY now.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> K.
>>>>>> On Jun 12, 2010, at 7:49 AM, Bruce Hershenson wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Robert Bolt, who wrote Lawrence, quickly followed with Doctor Zhivago, A 
>>>>>> Man for All Seasons (from his earlier play), and Ryan's Daughter, a 
>>>>>> pretty amazing string of wonderful screenplays.
>>>>>> Of course he didn't manage to include a tagline as great as "Get off my 
>>>>>> lawn!" in any of them, but he did his best.
>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Phil Edwards <p...@cinemarts.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Odd, we nearly always think of LAWRENCE in terms of its epic scope and 
>>>>>> spectacular visuals, but it has one of the most literate andprecise 
>>>>>> screenplays of almost any film I can think of.
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: Kirby McDaniel
>>>>>> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 2:06 PM
>>>>>> Subject: [MOPO] OT; BLIGH ME, GUVNOR
>>>>>> Tony Hayward:  I am reminded of the wonderful line Claude Rains (Dryden) 
>>>>>> gets in LAWRENCE:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Prince Feisal: You, I suspect, are chief architect of this compromise. 
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>> Mr. Dryden: Me, your Highness? On the whole, I wish I'd stayed in 
>>>>>> Tunbridge Wells.
>>>>>> http://www.theonion.com/articles/massive-flow-of-bullshit-continues-to-gush-from-bp,17564/
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>>>>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>>>>> Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
>>>>>> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>>>>> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.= 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 


         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to