Has it occurred to anyone that all he was complaining about was a $38
poster on ebay. Yes $38.
He was looking for a rebate of $10.
Yes - $10. The entire discussion concerned $10.
This is idiocy at its finest.
In a message dated 10/21/2011 4:41:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
loveno...@gmail.com writes:
Yet more sidestepping.
You didnt need to photograph this poster. You could have done a simple
cut and paste of the poster image taken directly from the Ebay ad...
simple. So the seller could have remained anonymous but the image
offered, in the least.
You have not mentioned even the title of this alleged, 4 4 4 4 folded
poster.
-KL
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Michael B <dialmbb...@aol.com> wrote:
> when the discussion began, i was hoping to include discussion about extra
> folds. i received a poster this past week with 2 EXTRA DISCLOSED folds.
it
> is all about disclosure. the discussion took on a life of its
> own................. because i didn't want to embarrass the seller,
how
> could i give the link with the seller's ID? Did you guys mean that i
should
> have photographed the poster in my house and post? i just realized that
> now. i guess i need to sign up to photobucket or
something................
> i lost that capability when aol stopped that service.
>
> michael
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 10/21/2011 4:17:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> rixpost...@aol.com writes:
>
> All he was ever asking for was a photo of the friggin' poster you were
> whining, whimpering and wailing about.
> Hey, you were the one who led us all down that pitiful primrose path
about
> your travails with all the folds your pathetic poster had. We spent an
> entire day discussing it, probably much to your enjoyment. The least you
> could do is show us a picture of the poster in question and put this
thing
> to rest. I agree...what's the big deal?
> Rick
>
> In a message dated 10/21/2011 1:03:39 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> dialmbb...@aol.com writes:
>
> challenging me on a youtube 3 or 4 min parody of REAR WINDOW? get
> real. for some reason you lovenoir are extremely bitter. i am not
looking
> to fix that; you deal with it.
>
>
> as to the poster with the 4 extra folds............ i tried to deal with
> this seller without embarrassment to the seller. the seller only
responded
> after i posted on MOPO. the seller made sporadic responses afterwards,
> then the seller wanted me to pay return postage. then the seller said
the
> poster was on consignment and needed owner's approval............. all
> wasted time. then the seller offered me 5.00 and a credit for 5.00
future
> purchases. then the seller was upset about paying ebay commission on
the
> 5.00. everything written by selling was so stupid. i told the seller
three
> or four days ago that i would accept 10.00 adjustment and be over with
it.
> the order of these event may be askew.
>
> this was never about money........ i never sought to embarrass the
seller.
>
> we'll soon it will be feedback time. i wont be shy. lovenoir, you
monitor
> my account........
>
>
> michael
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 10/21/2011 1:59:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> loveno...@gmail.com writes:
>
> Interesting how and why this member posts a link to this piece of crap
> video (and how is this video clip in any way related to movie
> posters?)
>
> Rear Window?? ok... whatever.
>
> If MOPO recalls, no information was ever given on the seller or
> identity of the "4 4 4 4x folded" poster that this member "got burned
> on," (even tho he was asked nicely several times)--- and then he
> follows up with this garbage?
>
> In the least case, this latest MOPO post should have been marked "OT."
>
> There are obvious "issues" going on behind the scenes here. LOL
>
> -KL
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Michael B <dialmbb...@aol.com> wrote:
>> Watch this video:
>>
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oITiJTXaa2s&feature=related
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> michael
>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>> ___________________________________________________________________ How
to
>> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
>> lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
>> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>
> Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________ How
to
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
> lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________ How
to
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
> lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
