Here is what most confuses me:

"Heritage then offers to donate the value of the Get Carter & Lennon to
charity, which we also decline"

Did they auction those two posters at all AFTER they received the ones you
claimed to have sent them? If so, do they now deny those were yours, and
where do they say they got them from? If they have NOT auctioned either of
those, then it must be that they still have them. Why would they not return
them even now if they have them (they could claim they were "misplaced"?

It also confuses me that they would offer to give money to charity if they
did nothing wrong.

Bruce

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Geraldine Kudaka <gkud...@rocketmail.com>wrote:

>
> 1. Rudy suckers you into sending posters to Heritage
>
> Suckers? I wouldn't have used that word. He was eager to make some money
> off a commission.
>
> 2. Heritage gets the posters, send you an inventory list and you think
> stuff is missing
>
> Correction, Heritage lists only posters they are putting up for the next
> auction. We do not realize there is something wrong here. We ask Heritage
> about what is not on the list and are told Heritage has a secure inventory
> and tagging process.
>
>
> 3. Heritage sells posters that aren't on the inventory list, sends you a
> check for $11K for at least one of them, and then doesn't sell other items
> that are on the list.
>
> Correction, Heritage then sells another poster -- which we didn't know was
> or wasn't on an inventory.
>
>
> 4. You are so mad about the missing items you decide to pack up another
> box of posters to send to Heritage without telling them and without making
> an inventory
>
> Correction - We are happy with the sales and think Heritage earned their
> commission. We think they are doing a good job and after this 2nd check
> clears, decide to send them more product.
>
> We are not aware of missing posters because in our conversations with
> Heritage, we are asked whether we want to sell these in Heritage's weekly
> auction. As our Star Wars sales are very good on ebay, we decline. We are
> told our posters are safely held as they are tagged and inventoried.
>
>
> 5. Several months later you are mad because they didn't tell you about the
> package you never told them was coming.
>
> Correction. After sending the 2nd batch, I call them to see when they are
> going to auction the new material we sent. Christ doesn't know what I am
> talking about promises to look into it. In our subsequent conversation, he
> states our posters have little value so they won't list them in the
> signature auction. To which, I ask, what about the Get Carter and Lennon
> poster knowing full well these two sold in the Feb. 2010 auction.
>
> 6. You argue about #2 and #5 for a while
> 7. Heritage says they sent you back everything they have.
> 8. You say they didn't.
>
> Correction, see the following revised 6,7, 8 & 9.
>
> 6. We argue, I complain, Grey threatens me with a law suit for slander and
> libel.
>
> 7. It takes a couple of months to hire the right lawyer to protect us from
> slander and libel. I then air my grievances publicly.
>
> 8.  Heritage offers to sell our future consignments without a commission,
> which we decline. Heritage then offers to donate the value of the Get
> Carter & Lennon to charity, which we also decline.
>
> 9. Grey then sends back the inventory of ours he has -- and yes, that is
> when I get really mad. Upon opening the packages and seeing what was in it,
> I was furious. Of course, I immediately knew something was amiss because
> the shipping tubes were not the ones we had bought from Uline and shipped
> off our posters to Heritage in. In other words, our posters were unpacked
> and repacked.
>
> It was then I sat down and went through the Heritage file with a fine
> tooth comb.
>
> Am I raving mad right now?
>
> No, I'd say the work it takes to challenge a well-loved dealer whom most
> of you do business with regularly takes the uumph out of any anger.
>
> If anything, I am calmly rational now, knowing that we learned a good
> lesson which others can learn from also.
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* Sean Linkenback <s...@platinumposters.com>
> *To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> *Sent:* Monday, June 4, 2012 7:51 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] Rudy Franchi
>
> So to get the timeline correct:
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Geraldine Kudaka [mailto:gkud...@rocketmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 4, 2012 09:15 AM
> *To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] Rudy Franchi
>
> Rudy, this list is not just for dealers.
>
> There are a lot of people who lurk here who are interested in movie
> posters. They are not professional dealers in the business. Some may be
> non-poster business people interested in selling off collections acquired
> from either a lifetime of working in the industry, or inherited them from
> dad, who passed on.
>
> This is also a public list which non-subscribers go to for archived
> information on how to sell their posters..
>
> As a noted movie poster expert, these uninformed sellers need to know that
> you will encourage them to send their collections "post vite" to Heritage.
>
> You will not tell them that they need to protect themselves by doing a
> photographic inventory and log of their posters before sending to Heritage.
>
> You will not warn them that Heritage's inventory process is suspect and
> their software probably some home-user Access-like database program. (Here,
> I'm referring to security differences between programs like Quicken and
> true business accounting software which do not allow you to change entries
> without leaving a trail.)
>
> You will not tell them that heritage will not return posters they do not
> sell.
>
> You will simply funnel them to Heritage  -- for your commission.
>
> For this reason - among others - an esteemed seller on this list posted a
> wish that you were dead...
>
> Need I remind you I defended you? This was before I sat down and went
> though our Heritage file and discovered what was really going on. This was
> before I went online and found that Heritage has been accused by others for
> stealing items submitted for consignment.
>
> Last -- if you think you have spent "a huge amount of time" on this
> issue, get real. Suggesting we comply with Heritage's offer of selling
> without commission fees is certainly not an email that takes a lot of time
> to write. After Grey threatened us with legal action, we have spent far
> more money on attorney's fees than you have... That's a hard financial cost
> on top of the value of posters sent to Heritage.
>
> While I appreciate your suggestion we go bankrupt "sueing everybody
> involved", I will decline your advice.
>
> In the start, I said this list is not just for dealers. My emails are for
> the lurking public, now and in the future.
>
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* rudy franchi <r...@nostalgia.com>
> *To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> *Sent:* Friday, June 1, 2012 10:41 AM
> *Subject:* [MOPO] Reply To Geraldine
>
> It seems that I can't post to MOPO without Geraldine popping out like
> a cuckoo bird on a spring. This has gone beyond rational discussion.
> I've spent a huge amount of time on this problem and Grey has
> spent the equivalent of days in hour after hour of trying to reach a
> satisfactory conclusion.  Perhaps Geraldine should just sue everyone
> involved. After she loses, she can appeal it all the way to the
> Supreme Court where it will go down in judicial history as "When I've Got A
> Hammer  vs. Everything's A Nail."  Meanwhile, I will continue to
> occasionally post here and just put up with the tirades. On some of
> the stock market discussion boards I visit, one can put a particularly
> annoying person on "ignore" so that their posts won't show up in your
> message box. Would that we could do that here.
>
>         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>   ___________________________________________________________________
>               How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>
>       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
>             In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>
>     The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
>
>   Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________ How
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
> lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________ How
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
> lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
>
>   Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________ How
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
> lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
>


-- 
Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
P.O. Box 874
West Plains, MO 65775
Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take
lunch)
our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/>
our auctions <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html>

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to