Hi,
Arete (Glen) asked:
"Would you say that Psychedelic music was
not a static pattern of value?"
Wim replied:
I know very little about Psychedelic
music. You mean that someone must take drugs to produce it, which makes
experiencing DQ by drug users relevant for the world at large as it would
otherwise miss something valuable like Psychedelic music? Music consists (I
think) of intellectual patterns of value (in the broad sense) that can be of
value "to the world at large" by offering freedom to social patterns
of value. I don't know to what extent Psychedelic music does and can be
considered valuable. Do you? Gerhard would like to add:
Being a musician for many
years I would like to state that IMO music is indead an intellectual pattern of
value (and if you all dissagree, I'm out of here :-). Psychedellic music was to
me, when I for the first time was listening to it, a very dynamic quality
experience. I was trained to expect certain things from music, and suddenly
someone was more or less joking around with the static patterns I had. After a
while psychedellic music also become predictable, and in my understanding
static. I can not have a dynamic experience listening to Gong's "Flying
teapot" anymore, but it still brings me good memories. Any new music is
giving me dynamic quality experiences, and if the music is breaking new
barriers, the experience is greater. So I would say that psychedelic music has
value.
I do not think that you need to use drugs in order to make or
listen to psychedellic music. I've never used drugs, but have both been enjoing
the music and contributed with my own.
The difficult question is offcourse if my experiences are
biological or intellectual. The expected tonality of melodies are a social
pattern, and is different in different cultures. Dynamic changes to these static
patterns are induced by the intellectual level, but the experience feel like
both biological and intellectual. I think RMP stated something on this, but I
cant find it right now.
Gerhard
|
- RE: MD mescaline N. Glen Dickey
- Re: MD mescaline HisSheedness
- Re: MD mescaline Enliten3
- Re: MD mescaline Andi Norby
- Re: MD mescaline HisSheedness
- Re: MD mescaline Andi Norby
- Re: MD mescaline Wim Nusselder
- RE: MD mescaline N. Glen Dickey
- Re: MD mescaline HisSheedness
- Re: MD mescaline Brian Taylor
- RE: MD mescaline Gerhard Ersdal
- RE: MD mescaline N. Glen Dickey
- RE: MD mescaline Enliten3