Hi Gerhard
On 4 Jul 2001, at 21:13, Gerhard Ersdal wrote:
> It the moment I'm not certain that MoQ are defining my goal, as I am more confused
>now on the deductions from MoQ
> than I was when I joined this list. I was used to having the goals defined by
>humanitarianism and utilitarianism, but lacked a
> foundation for these arguments. Some years ago, I thought I found this foundation
>when reading Lila, and I call tell you
> that I was pleased. Now, after being a member of this discussion group for a half
>year, I've learned that it is possible
> to be pro and con death penalty, it is possible to be humanitarian and
>non-humanitarian, it is possible to defend
> egoism and utilitarianism, etc. etc., all based on the MoQ.
Most of the problems that arise in this respect are from superimposing the MoQ over a
set of
already held beliefs. Once you let go of your old beliefs and start afresh from a
Quality
foundation and apply an evolutionary morality the majority of problems dissolve.
Horse
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
