I can't snub my own candidate... #5 
(Negative campaigning = question #6 is ZAMM, not Lila.)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Horse [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 2:45 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      MF CALL FOR VOTES
> 
> Sorry for the delay folks, but I've been off with family stuff and got
> back later than I'd  anticipated. 
> As this is the case and the votes need to be out for 2 days I'll announce
> the new subject late  on the 1st of the New Year. 
> Send you votes in by about midnight GMT of the 1st Jan and assuming the
> world doesn't  end at midnight on the 31st or every computer in the world
> (or more to the point the one I  collect my mail from!!!) hasn't melted
> I'll post shortly after. 
> 
> Usual voting protocol: 
> 
> 1) Please use the same subject line as this post when you submit your
> vote. 
> 
> 2) Please vote for only one of the topics listed below. 
> 
> 
> 
> #1 Todd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   
>  A case study of the "giant" known to us as Las Vegas. Regarding the
> nature    
> of this giants "devouring nature". Focusing on (but not limited to) the
> 
> geography and energetic needs of this city (giant). Comparative thoughts
> of    
> various "giants/cities" will be allowed in order to enrich our case study
> of    
> Las Vegas.   
> 
> 
> #2 Ben Schafer   
> The fuzzy role of emotion in individual and cultural communication
> examined   
> within the Metaphysics of Quality.   
> 
> 
> #3  Diana   
> Aside from ZMM and LILA, which other books would you recommend to members
> of    MOQ.org?   
> 
> 
> #4 Rocky Hayes   
> Let's discuss the role that sex plays in Lila.   
> 
> Is it just a metaphor through which Pirsig pricks our 'ethical' skin, or
> 
> something more?   
> Is the reader to conclude that Lila is a slut/loose woman?   
> What does Rigel see in Lila's sexuality that causes him to react so    
> negatively to Phadreus' claim that Lila has quality?   
> Why is Lila willing to have intercourse with the Captain/Author/Phadreus?
> 
> (what's the draw/appeal to him.)   
> What are we to conclude about the special high quality sexual experience
> 
> Lila gives Phadreus - one that she suspects he is actually unaware of? Is
> he    
> unaware of it?   
> How does the physiological experience of an orgasm (arguably an experience
> 
> we share across the boundary of dozens of species) fit into the MOQ, or
> does    
> that experience fall outside of the MOQ? Is it not transcendental?   
> 
> 
> #5 David Buchanan   
> Let's discuss the book's conclusion.    
> Let's look at the meaning of those final scenes.   
> Rigel decides to take care of Lila.    
> The Captain disposes of the doll in a ritual.    
> Then he's prepared to head out on the Ocean and he's feeling free..." This
> divorce of art from technology is completely unnatural.  It's just  
> that it's gone on so long you have to be an archeologist to find out where
> 
> the two separated. Rotisserie assembly is actually a long-lost branch of
> sculpture,  
> so divorced from its roots by centuries of intellectual wrong turns that  
> just to associate the two sounds ludicrous."  
> ZAMM, chapter 14.  
> 
> Seen in the light of MOQ, why are art and technology divorced? What is
> their  
> role today? Is this divorce definitive?  
> 
> 
> ------- End of forwarded message ------- 
> 
> MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
------- End of forwarded message -------


MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org

Reply via email to