-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        MorphoJ - PLS: Blocks within a single configuration
Date:   Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:26:24 -0400
From:   Jana Makedonska <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]



Dear All,

I am a relatively new MorphoJ user studying craniofacial integration. I
used to apply a 2-block PLS approach to the study of the architecture of
the cranium, yet I have realized that the relative orientation of units
belonging to a functional whole should definitely be taken into account,
and thankfully, Dr. Klingenberg has implemented such a test in MorphoJ.

I have a question regarding the permutation tests of the singular axes
in a PLS analysis within a single configuration. I am providing an
example below:

Overall strength of association between blocks:
RV coefficient:   0.4261

Permutation test against the null hypothesis of independence
Number of randomization rounds: 10000
P-value: <.0001

Singular values and pairwise correlations of PLS scores between blocks:
           Singular value    P-value (perm.)    % total covar.
Correlation       P-value (perm.)
PLS1       0.00018668            1.0000     61.637             0.92015
<.0001
PLS2       0.00012496            1.0000     27.618             0.92618
<.0001
PLS3       0.00005060            1.0000      4.528
0.45438               0.8520
PLS4       0.00004219            1.0000      3.148
0.40476               0.8485
PLS5       0.00002855            1.0000      1.442
0.49857               0.1652
PLS6       0.00002183            1.0000      0.843
0.35042               0.6877
PLS7       0.00001383            1.0000      0.338
0.29619               0.7267
PLS8       0.00001321            1.0000      0.309
0.30962               0.3313
PLS9       0.00000881            1.0000      0.137
0.15853               0.8138

My question is: Why is the P-value of the singular axes always equal to 1?

Also, why are the p-values of the singular axes and the correlations
numerically identical when a 2-block PLS is run? (example pasted below)
I do have the impression that when a 2-block PLS is run in one of the
softwares of the IMP package, these p-values differed.


Overall strength of association between blocks:
RV coefficient:   0.1233

Permutation test against the null hypothesis of independence
Number of randomization rounds: 10000
P-value: 0.0148

Singular values and pairwise correlations of PLS scores between blocks:
           Singular value    P-value (perm.)    % total covar.
Correlation       P-value (perm.)
PLS1       0.00012760            0.0556     43.048
0.55104               0.0556
PLS2       0.00009617            0.0373     24.452
0.46313               0.0373
PLS3       0.00006845            0.1563     12.389
0.48423               0.1563
PLS4       0.00005697            0.0741      8.581
0.36577               0.0741
PLS5       0.00003937            0.3700      4.098
0.28668               0.3700
PLS6       0.00003259            0.2263      2.809
0.28990               0.2263
PLS7       0.00002723            0.1072      1.960
0.29277               0.1072
PLS8       0.00002195            0.0608      1.274
0.25144               0.0608
PLS9       0.00001644            0.0841      0.715
0.26427               0.0841
PLS10       0.00001275            0.0433      0.430
0.19014               0.0433
PLS11       0.00000960            0.0195      0.244
0.16680               0.0195


Any clue will be highly appreciated!

Thanks!

Jana
([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>)


--

--
"The world is full of mysteries. Life is one. The curious limitations of
finite minds are another."(J.B.S. Haldane, The Causes of Evolution)

Jana Makedonska, M.Sc.
Ph.D. candidate/ Part-time lecturer
Department of Anthropology
College of Arts & Sciences
State University of New York at Albany
1400 Washington Avenue
12222 Albany, NY
Office phone: 518-442-4699


Reply via email to