Re: Modularity, multiple modules

[morphmet_moderator]

----- Forwarded message from Markus Bastir <mbas...@mncn.csic.es> -----

Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 03:07:16 -0400
From: Markus Bastir <mbas...@mncn.csic.es>
Reply-To: Markus Bastir <mbas...@mncn.csic.es>
Subject: Re: Modularity, multiple modules
To: "morphmet@morphometrics.org" <morphmet@morphometrics.org>

Hello, 

there is a 3block PLS published by bookstein et al in 2003, journal of human evolution

Best

Markus

Sent from my iPad

On 11/05/2013, at 08:27, morphmet_modera...@morphometrics.org wrote:

----- Forwarded message from "wellens.h...@telenet.be" <wellens.h...@telenet.be> -----

Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 05:32:26 -0400
From: "wellens.h...@telenet.be" <wellens.h...@telenet.be>
Reply-To: "wellens.h...@telenet.be" <wellens.h...@telenet.be>
Subject: Modularity, multiple modules
To: morphmet@morphometrics.org

Dear all,

I'd very much like to utilize this utterly boring moment in the orthodontic congres I am attending to tap the morhometric hive's mind regarding the current state of the art regarding the testing of multi-modular modularity scenarios. I am well aware of the multi-RV coefficient proposed by Klingenberg. What new/old developments have I missed? Any literature references regarding alternative approaches (multi-block PLS ???) would be greatly appreciated. 

Best regards,

A bored orthodontist

Hans Wellens, DDS

Groene Poortdreef 16

8200 Sint-Michiels, Brugge

wellens.h...@telenet.be

Verzonden vanaf Samsung Mobile

----- End forwarded message -----

----- End forwarded message -----