----- Forwarded message from "Dennis E. Slice" <[email protected]> -----
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 03:55:22 -0400
From: "Dennis E. Slice" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Dennis E. Slice" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: cervical vertebrae morphometrics
To: [email protected]
This would be a good start:
Anat Rec B New Anat. 2006 Sep;289(5):184-94.
Functional morphology of the first cervical vertebra in humans and
nonhuman primates.
Manfreda E, Mitteroecker P, Bookstein FL, Schaefer K.
-ds
On 9/26/13 11:16 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Patrick Arnold <[email protected]> -----
>
> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 05:44:39 -0400
> From: Patrick Arnold <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: Patrick Arnold <[email protected]>
> Subject: cervical vertebrae morphometrics
> To: [email protected]
>
> Dear morphometric colleagues,
>
> I am new in the field of geometric morphometrics and I now have the
> possibility to use the morphometric approach for my master thesis.
> The idea is the morphological comparison of lower cervical vertebrae
> of dogs. At first I want to compare if third cervical vertebrae has
> similar shape in different breeds and if fourth vertebrae has similar
> shape in different breeds, and so on. In second test we want to
> compare the different vertebrae of all dogs among each other to
> question the uniformity of the lower cervical vertebrae which is
> common opinion in literature.
> Now I am looking for references dealing with vertebral morphometrics
> and the basics of 3D lanmark use. I would be very very glad if you
> could send some useful information to me. Thanks in advance for
> answering!
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Patrick Arnold
>
> Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
> Institute of Systematic Zoology and Evolutionary Biology
> [email protected]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent through https://webmail.uni-jena.de
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
>
----- End forwarded message -----
