Dear all,
I am trying to engage with the media in an effort of showing to the
public why geometric morphometrics is important to address relevant
biological questions.
Below are two recent examples that I hope you will be able to share
and comments on:
https://theconversation.com/italy-has-its-own-subspecies-of-bear-but-there-are-only-50-left-75516
https://theconversation.com/falklands-wolf-that-baffled-darwin-was-actually-more-like-a-jackal-new-study-70858
This is a bit of extra work after publishing a paper, but I hope the
whole society will become familiar with Thompson's grids as much as we
are.
Please any feedback/comment on how to proceed expanding impact of our
research will be more than welcome.
We are trying to use morphometrics in order to solve taxonomic issues
relevant to conservation biology. I am sure there is plenty of much
better examples in the literature and it will be nice to summarize
this in a relevant review at some point.
We are also working in a way to implement spatial analyses into PLS
(e.g. as covariance matrix it could be incorporated as error term
similarly to PGLS procedure). Anyone aware of similar examples or
planning to work on this please be in touch.
All the best
Carlo
--
MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MORPHMET" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org.
