Can hardly wait for this discussion! Being (relatively) new teachihng, I've been reading bits and pieces of discussions, research, etc. about the effects/non-effects of strategy instruction. Have not seen/read this article but would like to. Blessings, Judy
--- On Tue, 8/18/09, cnjpal...@aol.com <cnjpal...@aol.com> wrote: From: cnjpal...@aol.com <cnjpal...@aol.com> Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] Does strategy instruction inhibit comprehension?/Cross posting To: mosaic@literacyworkshop.org Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2009, 6:29 AM Nancy I have a copy of the article and am reading it now. I am in the process of contacting IRA and see if I can get temporary permission to post it on the tools page. I am an IRA member so we will see. Jennifer In a message dated 8/16/2009 10:20:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, creeche...@aol.com writes: _Click here: Reading Research Quarterly : July/August/September 2009 : Abstract of Rethinking Reading Comprehension Instruction_ (http://www.reading.org/Publish.aspx?page=/publications/journals/rrq/v44/i3/ abstracts/rrq-44-3-mc keown.html&mode=redirect) I am more than one listserv. Within the past month, on one of the listservs, someone posted the link to this recent article from Reading Research Quarterly. I read the abstract, sent the link to my students and printed out the article. It is 37 pages long so it got set aside. Recently, I woke up at 2:30 and couldn't get back to sleep. I decided that reading something on the "dry" side might help me nod off. However, when I started reading this, I was hooked. Although this is a small study, the repercussions of this research project caused me some disequilibrium. I can't find the email with the link that originally prompted me to investigate this, even though I've searched the archives. It really doesn't matter. What I was hoping is that others of you would take the time to read it in the next couple of days, and then we could have an online conversation about it. Unfortunately, I believe one has to be a member of IRA or have access to a university library in order to get the complete article. You can read the abstract at the link above. One more thing, in the notes at the end of the article, Tim Shanahan is thanked for being "instrumental in the conception and design of the study." Tim has chatted with us on the Mosaic list before, and I know some have strong feelings about his beliefs in regard to literacy. If we decide to talk about this research study, maybe someone could draw him, or one of the authors, into our conversation. Just to cause a little provocation, as they say in Reggio, the research that the article was written about suggests that strategy instruction is possibly the least effective in helping children understand content area reading as compared to a basal, or discussion with questioning, about the content. The authors also suggest that strategy instruction might inhibit comprehension because students ( 5th graders in this case) are thinking about the strategy rather than the content. Let me know if anyone is interested in having an online conversation about this. _______________________________________________ Mosaic mailing list Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. _______________________________________________ Mosaic mailing list Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
