hi chi thao
 
  _____  

From: Phuong Thao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 07 February 2008 11:31
To: 'Hieu Hoang'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Moses-support] Error in moses config file?



Chao anh Hieu,

 

Chuc mung nam moi!!!

 

From: Hieu Hoang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



chao anh thao    => chao chi Tha?o :D

 

Thanks for your explanation. But I still wonder about your answer: 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Phuong Thao
Sent: 05 February 2008 07:41
To: 'Hieu Hoang'; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Moses-support] Error in moses config file?

Dear Hieu Hoang,

 

Thanks for your quick reply. 

The error was fixed when I changed the mapping from 0 G 0 to 1 G 0. 

 

I have another question to confirm my understanding.

As I understand, when I set:

 

[mapping]

0 T 0

1 T 1

1 G 0

 

[ttable-file]

0 0 5 ./phrase-table.0-0

1,2 1,2 5 ./phrase-table.1,2-1,2

 

[generation-file]

1,2 0 2 ./generation.1,2-0

 

It means I will have translation from factor 0 to 0; 1,2 to 1,2 and have
generation from factors 1,2 to factor 0 in target side.

Are there two choices: one from 0 T 0 and one from 1 G 0, and they will be
combined with the language model to make decision? 

    0 T 0  - only creates factor 0

 

   1 T 1

   1 G 0

   - creates factor 0, 1, 2

so if you have a language model on factor 1 or 2, this configuration will
blow up

 

            => I had run the system: one with only language model on factor
0, and one with language models on factors 0,1,2. They both worked with the
same configuration as above. And the results are different. So what is your
meaning when you said "this configuration will blow up"? and what is the
function of those language models here?

 

i thought the decoder would segfault. however, if it works, then it works.

 

And when I set:

[mapping]

0 T 0

0 G 0

 

[ttable-file]

1,2  1,2  5 .../phrase-table.1,2-1,2

 

[generation-file]

1,2  0  2  .../generation.1,2-0

 

In this case, this is only one result returned from generation step 1,2 to
0, and factor 0 don't play any role here, isn't it?

   factor 0 is created - this creates factors 0, 1, and 2. 

Many thanks for your help.

 

Best,

Thao.

 

_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to