Hi,
Amusingly enough, the parallel thread regarding MultEval answers your
question: https://github.com/jhclark/multeval .
Kenneth
On 01/24/13 11:15, Patrik Lambert wrote:
> Hi Saeed,
>
> I fully agree with you. I don't think that in Physics, for example, a
> paper without a reliable estimation of the error on the measurements
> would be publishable, nor would you see in a paper results with more
> digits than the significant ones.
> Having easy-to-use statistical significant tests in the Moses pipeline
> seems a great idea to spread good practices in the community. Maybe a
> good project idea for next MT Marathon (or is it already available in
> Moses)?
>
> Patrik
>
>> Just a suggestion: IMHO, adding a significance test implementation to
>> Moses
>> will help users to report such tests. I do not get good feelings when I
>> read a paper with no statistical significance tests.
> _______________________________________________
> Moses-support mailing list
> Moses-support@mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
Moses-support@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
