Hi,

if you have the computing resources, then running multiple tuning runs
will give you more reliable results, regardless of use of MERT or
k-best MIRA.

-phi

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Thomas Meyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, Philipp, I'll try that.
>
> As a follow-up question, I'm using batch-mira for tuning with these
> features. Should I here also run several tunings for my systems and average
> the scores when evaluating as is nowadays done with MERT to account for
> instability?
>
> Thanks again,
> Thomas
>
>
>
> On 16/09/13 10:55, Philipp Koehn wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> one way to do this is to produce an n-best list of size 1, which then
> reports a detailed score breakdown.
>
> -phi
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Thomas Meyer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I started experimenting with sparse lexical source word deletion
>> features in Moses. All works fine, but can I actually see somewhere the
>> deletions that are made to the source texts?
>>
>> I am using the EMS with decoder verbosity set to 0. Maybe it's enough to
>> just increase the verbosity level?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Thomas
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moses-support mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to