Sorry Rico, my bad, I didn't turn on that switch. Now it compiled. However, c++11 was not specified in Jamroot, how did your compiler have that flag on?
Best regards, *Jie Jiang* Senior Language Technology Specialist Capita Translation and Interpreting Riverside Court, Huddersfield Road, Delph, Oldham, OL3 5FZ | Tel (UK): +44 845 367 7000 | Tel (US): +1 (800) 579-5010 Tel Direct: +44 (0)844 854 8984 | mail.jie.ji...@gmail.com | Skype ID: jie.jiang-capita-ti www.capitatranslationinterpreting.com 2014/1/15 Rico Sennrich <rico.sennr...@gmx.ch> > On 15.01.2014 16:58, Jie Jiang wrote: > > Hi Roco: > > I think in the future it would be better to wrap up the c11 code with > macros like: > > #if __cplusplus >= 201103L > //c11 code here > # > //old code here > #endif > > or else it will fail others who are not using a compiler with c11 > support, like what happened to me this morning... > > > sorry for the trouble. it was unclear how many people would be having > problems with -std=c++11 (even your compiler [TDM-gcc 4.7.1] theoretically > supports the subset of c++11 features that was used). > > As to using macros: > nah, I was mainly interested in the usability enhancements coming with > c++11. Having to write two versions of the same code would be even worse > than the status quo. > > - > Rico >
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list Moses-support@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
