Are you kidding? I thought "decoding" the meaning of "f" and "e" was a right of passage for "real" computational linguists! Besides, you go and change that and I have to type four more characters every time I run the script. Are there any better reasons for leaving things the way they are?
--- Ok. I'll pull my bleeding tongue from my clinched teeth now :) but you will create more work for many people with automation wrappers around those scripts. Tom On 11/13/2014 04:04 PM, Kenneth Heafield wrote: > Dear Moses, > > Do the -e and -f arguments to train-model.perl and clean-corpus-n.perl > actually get interpreted by anything? Or are they just there as file > name extensions that could just as easily be "src" and "tgt"? I think > it doesn't matter. > > Kenneth > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > Moses-support@mit.edu > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list Moses-support@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
