On Wednesday, October 26, 2022, at 8:33 PM -0700, Keith Winstein wrote: > (1) Should we update the ChangeLog file for the source release? It looks > like you (and achin?) already wrote text for it.
I completely forgot about the changelog. Yes, we should update that. What do you think – should we update the changelog and push a 1.4.1 tag, or should we update the changelog and replace the existing 1.4.0 tag with a new one that includes the changelog update? > (2) Should I make the final 1.4.0 debian/changelog entry (probably > including the same bullet points as we'll put into ChangeLog) or do you > want to make a PR for that? I can take care of the Debian work. Debian generally prefers to keep upstream changelog entries out of debian/changelog – debian/changelog is supposed to be a changelog for the packaging, not the package. But I’ll make sure the Mosh changelog is included in /usr/share/doc/mosh. > (3) In the past the release announcement email named/credited the "primary > developer and release manager" -- what do you want it to say this time? > (I.e who should be credited and in what order?) For developers, it looks like cgull, Anders, Alex, and I all contributed over 100 lines of diff to Mosh since the last release. It’s an arbitrary cutoff, but it seems as good as any to me. I think cgull should probably go first on the list, since they were making active contributions until 2021. As for release manager, I think that’s Alex. He was definitely the forcing function here. :) _______________________________________________ mosh-devel mailing list mosh-devel@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mosh-devel