I did some testing on OS X and Fedora. As far as I can tell, the release candidate works great, as long as we release a `make dist` tarball. I was able to build fedora packages as well and they work great.
-Alex On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas <j...@openbsd.org> wrote: > john hood <cg...@glup.org> writes: > >> On 7/3/15 1:51 AM, john hood wrote: >>> On 7/2/15 8:43 PM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > > [...] > >>>> PS: will we have to regen autoconf/make files for 1.2.5-release? >>> >>> Since you're fetching the distribution tarball, you don't have to. >> >> Looking more closely, I see you already changed the port to use Github's >> automatic release-tag tarballs, and we need to figure out where to put >> our distribution tarballs. I or Keith will have a better answer for you >> once we figure this out. > > Yup. I only switched to github because that's the url you advertized. > I'd be fine with fetching mosh-1.2.5 from mosh.mit.edu if you keep it > that way. > > -- > jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE > > _______________________________________________ > mosh-devel mailing list > mosh-de...@mit.edu > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mosh-devel _______________________________________________ mosh-users mailing list mosh-users@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mosh-users
