Send Motion-user mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Motion-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage (rmbusy)
2. Re: Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage (Ruslan Matveev)
3. Re: Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage (rmbusy)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:42:20 -0700
From: rmbusy <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
I didn't enable it, and it says it defaults to disabled, so it appears I
do not.
--
Rob.
On 7/18/19 11:35 AM, Ruslan Matveev wrote:
> Do you have passtrough on?
>
> ??, 18 ???. 2019 ?., 21:33 rmbusy <[email protected]
> <mailto:rmbusy%[email protected]>>:
>
> I upgraded my system to the latest version of Linux, and at the same
> time, upgraded Motion from 4.1.1 to 4.2.2.
>
> I have 8 RTSP cameras set up, 5 cameras configured for snapshot
> mode at
> 1 frame per second (all 2MP), and 3 streaming at 5 frames per
> second (2
> 2MP, 1 1MP).? All of this is running on a quad core Rock64 w/ 4GB
> DRAM,
> at the default CPU frequency (1.3GHz).
>
> With 4.1.1, I was seeing around 150% CPU utilization (via top),
> and when
> connecting to the web page, around 300% CPU utilization. Since the
> Rock64 is a quad core ARM processor, max is 400%.
>
> Now with 4.2.2 and the same camera configuration files (updated
> with new
> option names), I'm seeing CPU utilization of 250%, and when
> connecting
> to the web page, the numbers are maxed out, and the web page is
> basically non-responsive.
>
> Since I upgraded the underlying OS, I can't rule out that it's
> requiring
> more CPU cycles for Motion to do the same thing, but that seems
> unlikely.? Running top doesn't show anything else using CPU cycles
> (other than top).
>
> Can anyone confirm if 4.2.2 is using significantly more CPU cycles
> than
> 4.1.1?? If I can't find a way to reduce the usage, I may have to
> go back
> to 4.1.1.
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
>
> --
> Rob.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 21:45:22 +0300
From: Ruslan Matveev <[email protected]>
To: Motion discussion list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage
Message-ID:
<CABqvc7ssfoWc4Mwg+qDfs+r2sYSJfv+smAOxDFv0=uqukpg...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Try to do it ;) And also decrease motion stream resolution, it will do the
trick.
??, 18 ???. 2019 ?., 21:42 rmbusy <[email protected]>:
> I didn't enable it, and it says it defaults to disabled, so it appears I
> do not.
>
>
> --
> Rob.
>
>
>
> On 7/18/19 11:35 AM, Ruslan Matveev wrote:
>
> Do you have passtrough on?
>
> ??, 18 ???. 2019 ?., 21:33 rmbusy <[email protected]>:
>
>> I upgraded my system to the latest version of Linux, and at the same
>> time, upgraded Motion from 4.1.1 to 4.2.2.
>>
>> I have 8 RTSP cameras set up, 5 cameras configured for snapshot mode at
>> 1 frame per second (all 2MP), and 3 streaming at 5 frames per second (2
>> 2MP, 1 1MP). All of this is running on a quad core Rock64 w/ 4GB DRAM,
>> at the default CPU frequency (1.3GHz).
>>
>> With 4.1.1, I was seeing around 150% CPU utilization (via top), and when
>> connecting to the web page, around 300% CPU utilization. Since the
>> Rock64 is a quad core ARM processor, max is 400%.
>>
>> Now with 4.2.2 and the same camera configuration files (updated with new
>> option names), I'm seeing CPU utilization of 250%, and when connecting
>> to the web page, the numbers are maxed out, and the web page is
>> basically non-responsive.
>>
>> Since I upgraded the underlying OS, I can't rule out that it's requiring
>> more CPU cycles for Motion to do the same thing, but that seems
>> unlikely. Running top doesn't show anything else using CPU cycles
>> (other than top).
>>
>> Can anyone confirm if 4.2.2 is using significantly more CPU cycles than
>> 4.1.1? If I can't find a way to reduce the usage, I may have to go back
>> to 4.1.1.
>>
>> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rob.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Motion-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>> https://motion-project.github.io/
>>
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing
> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-userhttps://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:40:55 -0700
From: rmbusy <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Since this setup worked on 4.1.1, I don't want to reduce the resolution
just to get 4.2.2 to work.? I'll go back to 4.1.1 before I do that.? How
would movie_passthough help reduce CPU usage?? Or is that just when
viewing on the web page?? Since only 3 cameras are streaming, it seems
like they would be the only ones to benefit.
I started building 4.1.1 from source, but ran into some FFMPEG build
problems.? I need to go back to it, so I can do a real apples to apples
comparison.? I was hoping someone could say definitively that CPU usage
went up with 4.2.2 over 4.1.1, or it did not.
--
Rob.
On 7/18/19 11:45 AM, Ruslan Matveev wrote:
> Try to do it ;) And also decrease motion stream resolution, it will do
> the trick.
>
> ??, 18 ???. 2019 ?., 21:42 rmbusy <[email protected]
> <mailto:rmbusy%[email protected]>>:
>
> I didn't enable it, and it says it defaults to disabled, so it
> appears I do not.
>
>
> --
> Rob.
>
>
>
> On 7/18/19 11:35 AM, Ruslan Matveev wrote:
>> Do you have passtrough on?
>>
>> ??, 18 ???. 2019 ?., 21:33 rmbusy <[email protected]
>> <mailto:rmbusy%[email protected]>>:
>>
>> I upgraded my system to the latest version of Linux, and at
>> the same
>> time, upgraded Motion from 4.1.1 to 4.2.2.
>>
>> I have 8 RTSP cameras set up, 5 cameras configured for
>> snapshot mode at
>> 1 frame per second (all 2MP), and 3 streaming at 5 frames per
>> second (2
>> 2MP, 1 1MP).? All of this is running on a quad core Rock64 w/
>> 4GB DRAM,
>> at the default CPU frequency (1.3GHz).
>>
>> With 4.1.1, I was seeing around 150% CPU utilization (via
>> top), and when
>> connecting to the web page, around 300% CPU utilization.
>> Since the
>> Rock64 is a quad core ARM processor, max is 400%.
>>
>> Now with 4.2.2 and the same camera configuration files
>> (updated with new
>> option names), I'm seeing CPU utilization of 250%, and when
>> connecting
>> to the web page, the numbers are maxed out, and the web page is
>> basically non-responsive.
>>
>> Since I upgraded the underlying OS, I can't rule out that
>> it's requiring
>> more CPU cycles for Motion to do the same thing, but that seems
>> unlikely.? Running top doesn't show anything else using CPU
>> cycles
>> (other than top).
>>
>> Can anyone confirm if 4.2.2 is using significantly more CPU
>> cycles than
>> 4.1.1?? If I can't find a way to reduce the usage, I may have
>> to go back
>> to 4.1.1.
>>
>> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rob.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Motion-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>> https://motion-project.github.io/
>>
>> Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Motion-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>> https://motion-project.github.io/
>>
>> Unsubscribe:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Motion-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
------------------------------
End of Motion-user Digest, Vol 157, Issue 20
********************************************
