Raph,
Many thanks for your response, I don't know why I didn't think of
that, it will work adequately for my purpose. Thanks again.
-Justin
On Oct 9, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Raphael Collet wrote:
Dear Justin,
The short answer is: no. The signature of the functor (or more
precisely, the module created from the functor) is only known at
runtime. You can check it explicitly with something like
{HasFeature M invokeAction}, where M is the module instanciated from
the functor.
Anyway, even statically typed languages like ML must check types at
runtime when they dynamically load stuff like modules...
Cheers,
raph
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Justin Henzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am working on porting a windows forms application to w3 using
mozart for the backend.
As it stands there is not much support for Mozart as an application
server in the w3 sense so I am using CGI and using a generic
WebAdaptor to dispatch functions.
The WebAdaptor looks for the key:action in the query string and
locates a functor by that name. As it stands I am using a convention
that the functor must implement and export a proc named InvokeAction.
My question is:
Is there any way to define a functor signature that a functor
must implement ala ML (OCAML)?
-Justin
_________________________________________________________________________________
mozart-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mozart-oz.org/mailman/listinfo/mozart-users
_________________________________________________________________________________
mozart-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mozart-oz.org/mailman/listinfo/mozart-users
_________________________________________________________________________________
mozart-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mozart-oz.org/mailman/listinfo/mozart-users
