On 18 Jun 2009, at 13:36, Maity, Ashis K wrote:
Are there some data points (references) as to how big a problem Oz
could
handle and its resource usage statistics?
I think the best reference is again Christian's book, he did lots of
performance measurements and compared the space-based approach with
the more common backtracking-based approach (copying vs trailing).
If I remember correctly, copying (i.e. Oz) is as efficient as
trailing concerning space consumption if you use adaptive recomputation.
If the performance of Oz is not enough for you, then you might be
interested to look at Gecode or also GeOz (the latter is work in
progress and not released yet).
Best
Torsten
--
Torsten Anders
Interdisciplinary Centre for Computer Music Research
University of Plymouth
Office: +44-1752-586219
Private: +44-1752-558917
http://strasheela.sourceforge.net
http://www.torsten-anders.de
_________________________________________________________________________________
mozart-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mozart-oz.org/mailman/listinfo/mozart-users
