On 11/01/2011 17:19, Lyle Kopnicky wrote:
One thing left out of this discussion is that there are ByteStrings. I
appreciate that! So there really is no need for a separate String type
that isn't a list. I still think it would be nice to have a Char type
though, hopefully Unicode. Lists of Chars would be nice to work with.
Yes, there are actually three representations: lists of characters
(easiest to manipulate), bytestrings (most memory efficient), and atoms
(interned in the symbol table: easiest to compare).
Peter
_________________________________________________________________________________
mozart-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mozart-oz.org/mailman/listinfo/mozart-users
