On 30 Oct 2012, at 22:55, Gustavo Gutierrez wrote:
> 2012/10/30 Torsten Anders <[email protected]>
> On 30 Oct 2012, at 22:30, Gustavo Gutierrez wrote:
> > That means that conceptually there is only one space as described in CTM. 
> > Internally that space contains a gecode space that is in charge of 
> > constraint propagation. It is worth to say that gecode spaces are a 
> > specialization of "mozart spaces" that are fine tunned for constraint 
> > programming. Both of them were designed by Christian: computation spaces in 
> > "oz-light" are the ones proposed in his PhD thesis and have been available 
> > in Mozart since the beginning.
> 
> If a Gecode space is nested in a single Oz space, does that mean that you 
> meanwhile decided to have the branching done by Gecode. In other words, 
> branching/distribution strategies cannot be defined in Oz anymore?
> 
> Our goal regarding this is two folded: first we would like to have all the 
> good things that are already present in gecode. That includes parallel search 
> (i.e. OS threads). Second we would also like to have the possibility of 
> defining both search engines and branching strategies directly in Oz. That is 
> very good for prototyping and to use specific problem information as 
> heuristics right away. In conclusion we will do as much as possible to have 
> the two ways available.

Great, that sounds very promising. 

Best wishes,
Torsten

--
Dr Torsten Anders
Course Leader, Music Technology
University of Bedfordshire
Park Square, Room A315
http://www.torsten-anders.de

_________________________________________________________________________________
mozart-users mailing list                               
[email protected]
http://www.mozart-oz.org/mailman/listinfo/mozart-users

Reply via email to