Bob Lord wrote: > Same as above. But I'm not sure I see what's misleading from the > existing UI. It seems pretty clear, at least to me. It requires the user to use engineer-level logic to deduce that if they uncheck the box "Use encryption when storing sensitive data" the program will instead obscure the data. It would be much clearer to explicitly list the two alternatives.
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available John Gardiner Myers
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available John Gardiner Myers
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Frank Hecker
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Nelson B. Bolyard
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Nelson B. Bolyard
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Frank Hecker
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Bob Lord
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Bob Lord
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Nelson B. Bolyard
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Bob Lord
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available John Gardiner Myers
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Ben Bucksch
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Nelson B. Bolyard
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Ben Bucksch
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Ben Bucksch
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Bob Lord
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Ben Bucksch
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available John Gardiner Myers
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available John Gardiner Myers
- Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available Ben Bucksch
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature