Jamie, I'm thinking about subclassing SocketImpl and creating a secure socket factory using JSS's SSLSocket. I'd like to try this out. Could that work? Any problems you could help me anticipate?
-- P "Jamie Nicolson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This doesn't make sense for JSS. It would make sense if JSS provided a > subclass of java.net.SocketImpl that could be plugged into a generic > java.net.Socket. But it doesn't work that way. JSS provides its own > subclass of java.net.Socket. We don't even override java.net.SocketImpl, > we just ignore the one we inherit from java.net.Socket. > > We will provide a JSSE implementation, and that should make it easier to > plug the JSS SSL socket implementation into generic apps. > > Patrick wrote: > > >Jamie, > > > >Would it make sense to you to have an implementation of > >java.net.SocketImplFactory (called sometime like SSLSocketFactory) in JSS, > >which would do all the SSLSocket and SSLServerSocket classes so? That way I > >could slip JSS security under any application relatively painlessly by doing > >a simple setSocketImplFactory(SSLSocketFactory). > > > >What do you say? > > > > >
