I've never seen this particular error before, but the error message 
seems to indicate something is wrong with either the OS_TARGET or 
OS_RELEASE environment variables. Most specifically, on of them has an 
imbeded space or newline somewhere, so the line

include $(CORE_DEPTH)/coreconf/$(OS_TARGET)$(OS_RELEASE).mk

Becomes:

include ../coreconf/WINNT 5.0.mk

rather than

include ../coreconf/WINNT5.0.mk

The possible causes could be either 1) OS_TARGET or OS_RELEASE is 
explicitly set in your environment, or 2) your uname program is 
returning something funny.

bob

miker wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I attempt to compile NSS with Netscape gmake 3.79.1(as recommended) after
> downloading source code through CVS.
> OS is Windows 2000.
> After gmake starts it stops with messages:
> 
> C:\build mozilla\mozilla\security\nss>gmake nss_build_all
> ../coreconf/config.mk:62: ../coreconf/WINNT: No such file or directory
> ../coreconf/config.mk:62: 5.0.mk: No such file or directory
> ../coreconf/config.mk:149: no file name for `-include'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:439: warning: overriding commands for target `WINNT'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:425: warning: ignoring old commands for target `WINNT'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:463: warning: overriding commands for target `WINNT'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:439: warning: ignoring old commands for target `WINNT'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:467: warning: overriding commands for target `WINNT'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:463: warning: ignoring old commands for target `WINNT'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:471: warning: overriding commands for target `WINNT'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:467: warning: ignoring old commands for target `WINNT'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:482: warning: overriding commands for target `WINNT'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:471: warning: ignoring old commands for target `WINNT'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:486: warning: overriding commands for target `WINNT'
> ../coreconf/rules.mk:482: warning: ignoring old commands for target `WINNT'
> gmake: *** No rule to make target `%.cpp', needed by `WINNT'.  Stop.
> 
> Please, anybody knows what is the matter?
> 
> 


Reply via email to