>You are assuming that the amount of information the phisher has to reveal about himself is constant in the two cases.
I was arguing by counter-example, I totally agree with you. My point was that the increased vetting rigour is a more significant deterrant to fraud than the increased price as the price difference of a few hundred dollars would be amoritzed over a large number of victims. _______________________________________________ mozilla-crypto mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-crypto
