Red Drag Diva wrote: > > > This would also further the adoption of Mozilla-based browsers by web > developers ... the JS debugger and DOM Inspector help need to be in the > help file. More work!
Great suggestions! At least, having content about the subjects will be really useful, though putting it in the installed help file may have some problems. I'm getting worried about footprint bloat, especially with the suggestions of more screenshots in the help. Maybe having advanced subjects served should be considered. Plus, presenting such topics to "classic" end users in a search list or table of contents would be added noise and potentially distracting (or overwhelming). Now, if everything were tagged with XML, one could present users with different help options---there could be a setting for "developer help" which, when selected, would display all "advanced" topics. Though that might be a tricky proposition, since there would be a fine line between so-called developer content and power-user stuff. --Steve
