On 23 Jul 2002, it is alleged that Brant Langer Gurganus sauntered in to netscape.public.mozilla.documentation and loudly proclaimed:
> > > -------- Original Message -------- > From: - Tue Jul 23 20:15:32 2002 > X-UIDL: B0001568102.MSG > X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 > X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from uv-server04 (unverified [65.173.193.55]) by > UV-SERVER02.ultravision.net (Vircom SMTPRS 5.1.202) with ESMTP id > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:59:40 > -0500 Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: > <aglarc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <ahhpf2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.30.00.00 (4) > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:59:40 -0500 > From: Jerry Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Brant Langer Gurganus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tips for Effective Documentation > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > You are correct. Filter 0 is our spam filter and myrealbox.com is in the > list to reject all mail from. Y'know, given Novell's attitude towards spam, I don't know whether to laugh or to cry. Just don't tell me that yahoo.com, msn.com, hotmail.com, or any of the umpteen different services that are used either directly or indirectly for spamming purposes /aren't/ being filtred out, 'k? Oh, well; at least now I know. /b. <snip />
